Site Presented By
Sunday, Nov 8, 2009
Well, because I know that you, Garrison, are above all a serious person, I seriously take your argument into account.
On the high-minded side of things we have to decide if he has committed a high crime. His justice department has given him justifications for things you have mentioned and I'm not sure how that works in law and whether the evidence would stand up.
But besides the high stupidity, incompetence, insensitivity, incuriosity, and the bludeoningly ignorant management override of every working group that ever knew anything about anything that has faced us in the last 5 years...
He clearly contorted evidence to coerce Congress to allow him to bring the country to war when the actual evidence wouldn't have allowed an invasion, under international law. That is as high a crime as was ever committed by a president.
Much of the initial coverage about Fort Hood turned out to be wrong. Is there anything wrong with that?
The accountability imposed by another country for the CIA's kidnapping and torture reveals much about our own.
Fox News' morning show plays to type, talking about whether Muslims in the Army should face "special debriefings"
The survivor and author is upset about comparisons some on the right are making to genocide
Once seen as a lunatic fringe, reactionary anti-women groups are courting respectability
Salon headlines in your mailbox
