This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Wednesday, February 22, 2006 12:00 AM

Fit to command

The U.S. should require that presidential candidates have military experience.

Read other letters about this article

  • Wednesday, February 22, 2006 09:27 AM

    so that means no GLBT presidents I guess?

    If you are going to require that all presidential candidates have military experience then you must first remove the ban on GLBT persons serving in the military, otherwise you are by default banning a whole class of people from seeking our nation's highest office.

    Also the disabled, since I guess people with physical disabilities do not enlist in the military. So no more Franklin Roosevelts holding office from their wheelchairs.

    This would also suck for women who aspire to the presidency, since although the numbers are growing, I think there are still more men than women serving in the military.

    I guess no Quaker presidents. No conscientious objectors!

    Anyone else I'm forgetting in this shrinking presidential field?

Most Active Letters Threads

530

Do Obama officials know what his Afghanistan plan is?

What explains the completely contradictory statements from key aides on a central plank of the war strategy?
128

Is my kids making me not smart?

Stay-at-home fatherhood dulls my intellect to a nub. Excuse me while I ponder the subtext of "Hippos Go Berserk"
126

Trig, the anti-abortion straw baby

Sarah Palin's son is being used to demonize pro-choicers
113

I survived Glenn Beck's Christmas spectacular

The preposterous showman brings his holiday book, and waterworks, to the stage and screen. Lights! Camera! Jesus!
85

I live in a van down by Duke University

How do I afford grad school without going into debt? A '94 Econoline, bulk food and creative civil disobedience

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon