This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Thursday, February 16, 2006 12:00 AM

Why we're publishing the new Abu Ghraib photos

America -- and the world -- has the right to know what was done in our name.

Read other letters about this article

  • Tuesday, February 21, 2006 01:42 PM

    Lisa

    Sorry about my lengthy diatribe, but there is so much that goes into this whole concept, it's hard to simply blame the President, or Congress, or both. I do not want us to be there any more than you do. I just want it completed the right way without Salon, Walsh, or other doves that have never stood a dangerous post in a hot spot to even remotely think they know what’s best for our soldiers. Or think that they can write and publish anything without consequence. You bet if President Bush did something (other than the war) tomorrow that possibly made soldiers die, you, and everyone else on the left would be clamoring for his resignation, etc. But let’s just let the press do whatever it wants, all the time. In the military, we used to joke that CNN was SecretNN because they would report troop movements, etc, when they got the chance. Do you wonder if we (the military) really wanted the enemy to KNOW where we are going? Kind of takes the surprise part out of the equation and also greatly increased the likely hood of a harder fight because now the enemy is better prepared. (This then equates to a greater loss of American life)

    The entire resolution is listed here:

    http://www.c-span.org/resources/pdf/hjres114.pdf

    Take the time and read it in its entirety and you can see why Bill Clinton, Bush II, the House of Representatives, and the Senate all voted for the resolution. You, like so many others have fallen into the hard lefts trap of "It's all about the WMD.", and as you can see it was not JUST the WMD. It may have been the thing that made us all take pause during this process, but the bottom line is there was a myriad of reasons in which to do this.

    Paragraph III through VII says it all, and I wonder what would have happened if he just would have let the inspectors in. He didn't for few possible reasons:

    1. His willingness to intimidate his enemies (including Iran)

    2. His continued development of WMD (Some say it went to Syria, but can we believe that?)

    3. He thought we would back down and go home.

    So, in my opinion, the past is the past. Stop the blaming, and start figuring out a plausible exit strategy. This we ALL want.

Most Active Letters Threads

740

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
374

America's regression

It's almost impossible to find a nation with as many torture advocates as the U.S. has.
358

Do Obama officials know what his Afghanistan plan is?

What explains the completely contradictory statements from key aides on a central plank of the war strategy?
287

Palin: Birthers have "fair question" about Obama

Of Obama birth, the ex-governor says, "the public is still, rightfully, making it an issue" (Updated)
211

The poster boy for progressive self-delusion

Read Hayden's 2008 Obama endorsement to remember the way the left sold our centrist president to itself

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon