Letters posted here are associated with the following article:

142
Letters
Friday, April 18, 2008 12:00 AM

Obama, get ready for the "Clinton rules"

As Wednesday's awful debate proves, it won't matter who the presidential nominee is -- the press will play footsie with McCain and attack the Democrat.

The letters thread is now closed.

View:
Friday, April 18, 2008 02:20 PM

Joe, Joe, Joe

Hillary has herself and through surrogates been subjecting Obama to those same "Hillary rules" with increasing verve over the last 6-8 weeks. Certainly, when Obama is the nominee the Republican party can and will do worse, but I think that if Democrats begin to think as a unit again there are steps that can be taken to counter-act this "business as usual" Republican tactic (see also: Glenn Greenwald).

Friday, April 18, 2008 02:21 PM

People here have no memory whatsoever

I would not be the least bit surprised if the people using terms like "Obamabots" today are the same people who tried to make "Deaniac" derisive last time. Wake up, silly gits. Your time is over. It's our time now. Get used to it.

Friday, April 18, 2008 02:26 PM

Re: ShawnWM

I don't think that very many Clinton supporters are racist, but you should look closely at the sentiments you are sharing with the world. Kinda scary. Do you really think that the number one issue in the black community, in SC or any other state is the race of the candidate? And your attempt to mimic urban vernacular is silly if not bothersome. You should step back and check yourself a bit.

Friday, April 18, 2008 02:36 PM

Yes.

Do you really think that the number one issue in the black community, in SC or any other state is the race of the candidate?

Yes. Furthermore since they themselves admit it, what's there to argue about?

See? This is how the left does itself in. While it's peachy okay for blacks to vote for their man and accuse the most black friendly administration in US history of being "racist", , then when if Hillary wins it's the 'Bradley effect'. Nobody could possibly be offended by the obnoxious Obama campaign and supporters who have run the most divisive, dishonest campaign I have ever seen a Dem launch while trying to project it onto their opponents. Nobody could possibly have legitmate concerns about his weak resume and his eyebrow raising associations. Nobody could just recognize the country is crumbling to ashes and remember that the Clintons successfully pulled us out of the first Bush meltdown and created surpluses and 23 million good paying jobs in the private sector. Nobody could logic that while the race was statstically 3-way heat, the Republicans had already done the damage they could do to Hillary whereas they were just starting on Obama and recognize she'd beaten the Republicans every time and was the most likely to.

No, No, we all must be RACIST RUBES!!!!!!!!!!

This is the hypocrisy that makes the hard left despised across 80-90% of America.

Friday, April 18, 2008 02:40 PM

Hilary and False Memory Syndrome

I don't like Hilary. I see here as yet another corporatist candidate who will not only not end the war, but start new ones on behalf of the oligarchy for whom she toils. Obama is probably the same, don't expect much (like a quick end to the occupation of Iraq) and you will be happy with him.

I say that I don't like Hilary because I want to defend her. She was not lying when she "misspoke" about landing under fire in Bosnia. Hilary knows, very very well, that everything she says gets fact checked, so when she told that story it seems probable that she did not realize that that the "incident" never happened.

More likely she confabulated the memory. No doubt she was told repeatedly that the trip was dangerous and received lots of warnings about how she might come under sniper fire, etc. Over time these warnings, and her memories, melded into a false narrative -- this phenomenon is called confabulation. Confabulation is common, we all do it, most of us don't get caught.

Hilary subconsciously wanted to make herself the hero, and over time, in her own mind at least, she was. She confabulated. She did not lie.

John Dean got caught too. See the link...

http://www.americanthinker.com/2005/11/john_deans_memory_and_scooter.html

Friday, April 18, 2008 02:55 PM

@ Bill Owen

As I said in this thread earlier I would rather that Hilary did knowingly lie about the 'sniper fire' than ponder the possibility of a 'Walter Mitty' character becoming president of the most powerful(for now at least) nation on earth with their finger on the nuclear trigger.

Friday, April 18, 2008 02:57 PM

Wow Shawn

I didn't know that the black community got together and wrote a giant treatise that only you had access to, admitting that they're all a bunch of idiots who don't care about the economy, health care, education, or jobs. You've really opened my eyes.

Friday, April 18, 2008 03:06 PM

Stop the madness!

Even though ShawnWM accurately describes a lot of things that piss off those of us who are not fanatically devoted to Obama, he (or she) also illustrates the absolute worst in both Clinton supporters and Obama supporters. Why can't we all just grow up? Neither candidate is perfect and both of them are trying to win in a system that's miles from perfect. In a political environment shaped by our hyper-disfunctional media, trying to "change the tone" is sort of like trying to disarm in the middle of a war.

But in reality, neither candidate has really been all that vicious with the other. 95% of the "divisiveness" and "bitterness" and so on in this campaign has been fabricated and/or blown out of proportion by our delightfully shallow and bloodthirsty media. Don't believe the hype - and I'm talking to you Obama fanatics especially, here.

The good news is that, if you happen to actually be concerned with issues, both candidates are damn good. I wish ShawnWM would tone it down and acknowledge that, even if he (or she) thinks Hillary is better, Obama is not the worst thing in the world. The same goes for the legions of Obama fanatics.

Friday, April 18, 2008 03:07 PM

The "Important States" Argument

An earlier poster said, speaking of Florida, New York and Ohio:

"Well, see there are realist and adults in these states. Hispanics, elderly, working class folks who understand what's at stake."

This is the standard, ridiculous "the states Clinton won are the only ones that matter" argument.

Its corollary is that are no realists or adults, Hispanics, elderly or working class folks in any of the following states, which all have to be disqualified for one reason or another:

Iowa, Mississippi, Vermont, Maryland, Illinois, Georgia, Alabama, Wisconsin, Virginia, DC, Louisiana, Utah, Missouri, Connecticut, Delaware, South Carolina, Hawaii, Wyoming, Washington, Nebraska, Minnesota, Alaska, Idaho, Kansas, North Dakota, Colorado and Maine.

I'm sure more impeccable logic will be put forward to explain away each of the above states.

Most Active Letters Threads

531

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
431

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
191

Bigotry wins in Switzerland

By voting to ban the construction of minarets, Switzerland apes the most extreme intolerance in the Muslim world
166

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
131

Facebook, the mean girls and me

At 34 years old, I finally feel like a popular seventh-grader. How sad is that?

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon