Letters to the Editor
-
Better advice for Obama...
Are you joking, Joe? There are plenty of issues involving the Clintons' financial affairs that are current and also say a lot about their ethics. The Kazakhstan uranium deal is just one. You said it was never secret. So, what is it? What is it about? What does it say about ethics? Why haven't we heard much about it? Why hasn't the press asked Hillary the "tough" questions about it? Where are those tax returns? You gave advice to Barack Obama. Here would be some of mine: 1). Go further with the NAFTA and trade deal argument. The problem with NAFTA isn't Canada. The problem is Mexico (companies and jobs across the border, unfair treatment to workers there as well) and then the other free trade deals involving China and other countries that care little to nothing about worker rights and social justice. 2). If health care insurance is as mandatory as car insurance and done in the very same way, then the middle-man, the insurance industry, which has destroyed the health care system in the first place, wins big-time and consumers, needing a single-payer system, lose. Look to the way health care is handled in other industrial countries, where it is free and universal. Those should be the models for a proper health care system. And we all should remember that Bill and Hillary couldn't get the health care job done before when Bill was president and there were Democratic majorities in both the Senate and House. Translation: The Clintons threw in the towel on it. 3). Obama shouldn't be stampeded into thinking he has to put Hillary on the ticket as a vice president choice. Obama would actually add to Hillary's ticket if it were reversed, but what does Hillary add to an Obama ticket? Nothing...but more Bill and Hillary baggage brought on-board. There are better choices--John Edwards, veterans, women. And for that matter, Obama could list a whole lot of good people who will join his White House efforts in different ways, positions, or campaigns (an Edwards anti-poverty campaign would be magnificent). Diversity is good and represents America. 4). Economic hardships, poverty, college costs for students, the unresolved Bush wars, etc. are issues needing constant attention.
-
Judicial Watch disagrees with you , too..
Joe: the only 2 entities pushing the Chicago story, are the Chicago Tribune and Team Clinton.
James Warren, Republican Managing Editor of the Chicago Tribune has been on a personal vendetta against Obama, (that just became inflamed since Obama started to win?? And after the paper endorsed him twice??) a vendetta so outqageous his paper routinely prints outright lies about him to inflame everyone: http://mediamatters.org/items/200803070014?f=i_latestappearing
If Warren know the truth, and if he's 'the managing editor' -how in the hell did that article get published, and, since the author lied-why is he still working for Warren and the Tribune??
But YOU need to forget this 'skeleton hunt' against Obama and get ready for MARCH 20. Judicial Watch wants a lot more than just tax returns Joe, as you very well know.
JW also wants Hillarys secretive back room health care plan revealed -and a court hearing is scheduled for March 20.
Judicial Watch says the Clinton's are trying to block the hearing.
Why would they be blocking just a sill old meeting Joe?
personally one astation to station personally so much so
Watch for March 20.
-
She has said no such thing
Now she is saying on the campaign trail that she would entertain Obama as Vice President.
Her husband otoh has implied it. I agree with you it's awful; he isn't qualifed to be VP much less President and it would put the security of the entire nation at stake to have this two-bit crook who shamelessly used posturing to the destitute of Chicago to obtain a luxurious lifestyle for himself and his loud-mouthed, arrogant wife.
Worse, it would be a smack in the head to the hard-working hispanic and white populist voters who have sensibly pledged their loyalty to an established stateswoman like Mrs. Clinton, as opposed to vulgar black racists who can only scream low-rent slurs and insist their entitled to foist an unqualified politician on the nation.
-
Sorry Joe, the Clinton's Did the Crime and They are Going to Pay for It, Not Us in November
We all know that Hillary Clinton and her companion, Bill, are hiding something. Otherwise they would have been quick to show us that they are 'fully vetted' as Hillary is so fond of saying.
They can trash Obama all they want, but these attempts at distraction will not help them. Today is Sunday and the Clintons could make believers out of us by opening their tax records for inspection. But they will not do so for they are hiding behind the "Trust Me" myth.
Our sitting President is another 'trust me' kind. The Clintons want us to shut up and believe. But we are the Americans and 'Trust Me' time is OVER.
-
@ ShawnWM
I just saw Tim Russert play video of her saying that "many of you wish you could vote for both of us. You may get your wish." And she went on to say he would make her ticket a dream ticket.
-
health care
health care insurance is as mandatory as car insurance and done in the very same way, then the middle-man, the insurance industry, which has destroyed the health care system in the first place
Sorry I disagree. The insurance companies like it or not have been faced with the same rising health care costs that the providers have. As one of those cases of irony, the federal government, the largest non-profit provider of healthcare in the country in fact has been far more cutthroat in denials and refusing to pay out than have private insurers. Of course the federal government under Bush no longer has the money.
Second to blame after Bush's sea of red ink is the self-entitlement mentality of people like Obama and his supporters, urban community loud-mouths and such who insist people who have the worst eating habits on earth and are far more overweight than the rest of Americans and have all the associated problems from it (hypertension, diabetes II, cardiovascular diseases, etc) that account for the overwhelming share of healthcare outlays should be entitled to a full free five-start coverage policy without adopting any much needed lifestyle changes. Listening to them bray ignorantly about what they're entitled to no-bars down is enough to make you a rightwinger.
Mrs. Clinton's plan to fully cover people while at the same time expecting them to take on the responsibility of much needed lifestyle changes is far far superior than unrealistically promising unfeasible free five-star plans to people who refuse to have a piece of fruit and a chicken breast instead of fried chicken and pasta or to get off their butt and take a walk.