Letters to the Editor
-
KcM
No game KcM. Only calling hypocrisy where I see it.
25% Hillary supporters will not vote for Obama. They will go with McCain instead. That's why Miss Walker will not answer that question posed to her about Clinton and McCain.
10% of Obama supporters will not vote for Clinton. Whose supporters are more Democrats? You do the math.
-
Klinton Math
For someone so allegedly bright and ultra experienced, it's strange in the extreme that the Hillster can't come up with any records: for the tax/income year, for the Big Bill Library, for her First Cuckold phone records, and on and on. The current administration- I think demonstrably the worst, most inept, and most corrupt in American history- makes secrecy a cornerstone of their way of governance. If you want to know, they won't tell you, and they'll pridefully tell you that they know better than you do what you need to know. Hillary's campaign is starting to seem awfully similar. Don't get me wrong: a Hillary presidency could not possibly be nearly as bad as Queen George's. It doesn't take much to exceed that standard. But is that what we want: the same manure in a cleaner bag? Not me. Hillary is the candidate of last resort. They're counting on the American public to be stupid enough to think that because Bushit has been such a disaster that the Clinton years must have been golden. Not so. Not close. He was a C+ president at best, and only looks so good because the fascist bastards in charge now are a stone cold F. Hillary is smart, well schooled, ambitious, and ordinary. We're in a state of affairs now that calls for bold, and possibly risky, change. That is not the KlintonKamp way. They want power first, last, and, always. Enough. It's time to get the hell out of the middle of the road and be American. You know: revolutionary.
-
Obama Clinton
Again the Obama bloggers are up to their eyeballs in insults. There is a lot about the Rezko thing that has not been out there in US papers. Sometimes you have to go across the pond to find out where the trail really leads.
The Obama team has put out as many hit ads as the other way, which even contain outright lies about Hillary or her positions.(Ohio Sheet- NAFTA Boom for economy) false.(Health care sheet began in Iowa False) this new attack,trying to say that Hillary team called Canadian government-not true- Hillary told Canadian government if they had contact with her team give names, when they couldn't come up with a name they had to admit that it wasn't true. Then we other Obama advisors telling us something different than what Obama says on War in Iraq & Fisa bill. An advisor calling HRC a Monster and the people of Ohio OBESESSIVE, (having evil spirits)
-
Complete Hypocrisy
I am an Obama supporter but I agree he needs to do more to make himself available to the press on this issue. I however think its ridiculous for Clinton to be making accusations that his credibility is somehow impugned by having associated with wrongdoers. The entire Clinton Whitehouse was spent fighting off allegations of this kind, most of which have proven as nothing more than speculation. Ironically, one of the more famous just happens to also involve them getting into real estate transactions with unsavory characters, Whitewater. I think most democrats and frankly most people would agree that the Clintons were unfairly attacked because of partisan politics. Yet the lesson Clinton learned was not that this type of politics should be stopped or changed, but rather she should use it to her advantage. If you are someone who thinks the system needs to change, I don't see how you could support Clinton, she doesn't seem to have any desire to change a system she has flourished in.
As far as the tax returns are concerned. There is no explanation for Clinton having not released them. Its not last years tax returns, it all tax returns since the Clintons have left the white house. If any republican had not released this information, Clinton would pounce. In fact she did just that when she ran for Senate in 2000. Clinton said it was "disturbing" her opponent Lazio had not released his returns. Her advisor, Wolfson- yes the same Wolfson who said Obama was guilty of Ken Starr like tactics for saying she should release hers- went to a Lazio event and yelled out "what are you trying to hide" I just don't understand how she is getting away with this- Wolfson responds that 20 years of tax returns is in the public domain and yet most of the press doesn't point out that 1980-2000 - eight years ago. Wolfson ought to be called out on this. How are they not being ripped to shreds on this, instead the media cowars for looking biased.
Whats more, Bill Clinton has being doing business around the world, taking donations, lobbying for companys to get contracts etc. You can't tell me that the public doesn't have the right to know about potential conflicts of interest that might arise for both Clinton as a Senator and Clinton as a President, by virtue of his making money around the world, including from foreign governments.
-
thicken your skin pricilla
You're sounding kinda prissy. But hey, What "great" background does your candidate have to stand on anyway?
-
@ KcM: The Rules Were In Effect
That Obama quote about FL delegates is a reach, and I'm sure you know it. It wasn't even substantiated that the new rules had gone down at that point, and he was just crossing the street to get some cameras out of his mix. Seems pretty clear, but if not, I can provide some links.
I believe that you believe what you do. But I also think it's disingenuous to say that Obama didn't know the rules were in effect when he talked with reporters about seating Florida delegates, or that his comment is "a reach."
One of the problems I have with Obama and his followers is that there often seems to be an abundance of excuses and justifications for his behavior and words. Clinton seems to be held to "Clinton rules", while Obama is allowed to slide under the radar. In old-fashioned parlance, that's a "double standard."