Letters to the Editor

This letter is associated with the following article:
Read other letters about this article
Some free advice for Obama
The Clintons' personal and financial affairs have already been investigated ad nauseam. He should focus on answering any serious questions raised about his own.
By Joe Conason [2008-03-07]

  • @ little lord baltimore: Significant Policy? Significant Legislation?

    I really don't see how calling the ACT to implement recommendations of the 9/11 Commission insignificant, or how a "No Confidence" vote against AG Alberto Gonzales isn't significant.

    And frankly, the comment that Sen. Clinton's legislative accomplishments aren't "significant" simply blows my mind. I can understand that you're an Obama follower. However, and as I have posted before, you don't do yourself or Sen. Obama any favors by misstating, minimizing and downplaying Sen. Clinton's record. And if you want a complete record, I suggest you go to the Thomas legislative database.

    Finally, in answer to the question about FISA: I thought I answered it. We have a disagreement, apparently, about what constitutes "significant policy measures", since you believe that Sen. Clinton's NVs on two FISA amendments constitutes more "significant" policy measures than others.

    There doesn't seem much more to say. We agree to disagree...

    -- ljwalker53
    [Read ljwalker53's other letters]
    Friday, March 7, 2008 09:22 PM
Read other letters about this article

Letters Help