This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Friday, April 21, 2006 12:00 AM

Attacking Iran: Are they nuts?

If the U.S. attacked Iran, the consequences would be catastrophic -- including a possible American retreat under fire in Iraq.

Read other letters about this article

  • Thursday, April 20, 2006 07:02 PM

    wow you got that military scenario wrong.

    I usually like your writing but don't try to go with military strategy anymore. If iran came back across OPEN ground with ANY number of troops our air superiority would set up another turkey shoot. Our ground troops wouldn't even be likely to be involved. Yes, they may succeed in cutting a supply line but it wouldn't be for long as hundreds of thousands of pounds of munitions and tank busters etc. (that were developed exactly for that sort of attack) would chew them up.

    What's the greater danger? That it would more deeply ingrain any insurgency and encourage sunni's to further acts of terror and possible civil war.

    Our military can take out any military in open terms. That is exactly what it was developed for over 50 years. What we cannot do is post war activities.

Most Active Letters Threads

523

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
426

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
187

Bigotry wins in Switzerland

By voting to ban the construction of minarets, Switzerland apes the most extreme intolerance in the Muslim world
130

Facebook, the mean girls and me

At 34 years old, I finally feel like a popular seventh-grader. How sad is that?
103

Polanski moves from jail to ski chalet

The rapist director is granted bail, and one of his most vocal apologists celebrates

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon