This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Friday, April 21, 2006 12:00 AM

Attacking Iran: Are they nuts?

If the U.S. attacked Iran, the consequences would be catastrophic -- including a possible American retreat under fire in Iraq.
By Joe Conason

Read other letters about this article

  • Thursday, April 20, 2006 07:20 PM

    we can beat any other country...so long as it's video games we're talking about

    We are getting our asses kicked in two countries at once with the best-equipped military on the planet.

    Yeah, Iran will be a piece of cake, if we can get them to line up and wait until we reload.

    You retarded chicken hawks need to be in the front of the line. Do you think the Iranians will bury us in well-manicured fields of crosses like the French did?

    Thank you for fucking up a perfectly good world. See you in hell.

    —been there

    Flag
Read other letters about this article

Most Active Letters Threads

685

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
Glenn Greenwald Read article
592

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
Glenn Greenwald Read article
543

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
Glenn Greenwald Read article
440

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
Glenn Greenwald Read article
316

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame
Joan Walsh Read article

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon