Letters to the Editor
-
Graphic Imagery
If the stand alone question "is this a forged document" could ever go to court, the likely outcome would be a hung jury. The pros and cons on this board point to the many inconsistencies, suspect methodologies, and so on. In the end, why should we care. Do we get to negate the fact that Israel bombed the shit out of Beirut, because there was one, ONE "faked" photo out of hundreds?
The reality is that there is plenty of other evidence and witness statements that substantiates the case Rather made. And I won't detail them here, because hell it's fonts and typewriters that are important.
Bush dodged Vietnam (duh) and he did not complete his service (duh), the issue is how the emperor can be naked, in the middle of the public square, babbling how beautiful his clothes are, and people are then easily led to debating fonts. How does that happen? God, sometimes I think we are a nation of morons.
Rather was railroaded and CBS will be shown that it found it in it's own best interest to suckle at the tit of Carl Rove. Wow, now there's an image.