This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Thursday, October 26, 2006 12:00 AM

Bush's policy quagmire

The president is already signaling he'll disregard James A. Baker III's recommendations for reshaping U.S. policy in the Middle East. But will Baker sit still?

Read other letters about this article

  • Thursday, October 26, 2006 09:59 AM

    Well-put, Sidney, Michaelm and Kickstart

    And let's be realistic (hmmm, perhaps the word is cynical?): Baker's only getting involved because his buds on various corporate boards and in various lobbying groups are getting antsy.

    Hell, they were told they'd have a brand-y-new Iraq to call their financial playground well before now, not a Land of Misfit & Broken People and Dreams, which is a very tame description of what Iraq is. (A state of civil war and a Wild West disaster area are more on target.)

    Still, if Baker & Co. can work with the new Democratic leadership post-election to set much-needed time tables and eventually get more of our troops home, so be it. It was economic interests (and Dubya's mano-a-mano issue with Poppy) that got us in this mess, it'll be economic interests that get us out.

Most Active Letters Threads

660

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
543

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
437

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
208

Bigotry wins in Switzerland

By voting to ban the construction of minarets, Switzerland apes the most extreme intolerance in the Muslim world
149

Mike Huckabee's fatally bad judgment

Brutality by another Huck-pardoned criminal suggests the 2012 GOP hopeful listened more to pastors than prosecutors

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon