Letters posted here are associated with the following article:

6
Letters
Monday, June 8, 2009 12:00 AM

Sotomayor, the non-activist judge

An ACLU report on Sotomayor's judicial record concludes that her political beliefs are difficult to characterize.

The letters thread is now closed.

View:
Tuesday, June 9, 2009 02:03 PM

@awesome-o

With very rare exceptions, the Constitution refers to "persons" or "the people" rather than "citizens." That is, civil rights apply to everyone who comes under the jurisdiction of US law, citizens or not. The ACLU understands this; it's alarming how many Americans don't.

As a practical matter, those who think that rights can apply to one group of people but not another usually find out, quite dramatically, how wrong they are. My father, who is white, grew up in apartheid-era South Africa. Everyone knows how bad it was to be black in SA in those days, but what they don't realize is that most white people were pretty afraid of the government as well, because it had to be a police state to exercise that level of control. Once you start taking rights away from one group of people, everyone else's rights start disappearing too. History is full of examples of "privileged" groups who have gone along with tyranny by assuring themselves "it won't happen to me" -- and they're always wrong in the end.

Tuesday, June 9, 2009 01:06 PM

@Daniel Dvorkin

They're biased in favor of the Constitution and the rights of all Americans. Could you explain exactly what problem you have with that?

I'm not Soliel, but I can tell you the problem I have with the ACLU: they don't just represent Americans anymore. I used to really respect their work, but until they stop supporting illegal immigrants and focus once again on American citizens, they won't see one red dime from me.

I think a lot of people feel that way (probably not on Salon though).

Tuesday, June 9, 2009 10:15 AM

oh, and Soliel ...

... you're right, of course, that the ACLU has a bias. They're biased in favor of the Constitution and the rights of all Americans. Could you explain exactly what problem you have with that?

Tuesday, June 9, 2009 10:14 AM

Oh, that's beautiful.

The first letter predicts the right-wing response to the letter, and the second letter provides a perfect example.

Monday, June 8, 2009 05:14 PM

I am sorry...

the ACLU is not exactly unbiased.

Their opinion of her means nothing...they are not objective at all.

Monday, June 8, 2009 02:58 PM

For the nutters...

Those with a decidedly partisan, lopsided, wrongheaded, nutter view of the world will see ACLU approval is solid confirmation of "liberal bias."

Most Active Letters Threads

530

Do Obama officials know what his Afghanistan plan is?

What explains the completely contradictory statements from key aides on a central plank of the war strategy?
408

America's regression

It's almost impossible to find a nation with as many torture advocates as the U.S. has.
332

Palin: Birthers have "fair question" about Obama

Of Obama birth, the ex-governor says, "the public is still, rightfully, making it an issue" (Updated)
128

Is my kids making me not smart?

Stay-at-home fatherhood dulls my intellect to a nub. Excuse me while I ponder the subtext of "Hippos Go Berserk"
126

Trig, the anti-abortion straw baby

Sarah Palin's son is being used to demonize pro-choicers

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon