Letters posted here are associated with the following article:
The letters thread is now closed.
What goes around comes around. O'Reilly nightly denigrates the human spirit. Only a man without moral conscience would sling hate and demoralize the society at large.
When one foul-mouths others it ricochets back. Preaching slanderous judgments can incite those with an unstable constitution. O'Reilly is responsible for his words (of influence) that are as powerful as his imperceptible deeds.
Where will you be on Judgment Day, Heir O'Reilly? O’Reilly’s arrogance will be silenced when he's off air. His cowardice to be revealed, when he no longer has a microphone to hide behind.
My response to this statement is that I cannot think of anyone more of a bully than a big bad doctor with his big bad doctor bag full of tricks which murder helpless infants.Thats who I think the REAL BULLY IS.
My understanding of the situation must be thoroughly wrong then. I wasn't aware that the doctor drugged or otherwise incapacitated his "victims" so that he could carry out forced abortions on unwitting women.
Care to provide a link to some reputable information that might back up your profound assertion?
The posts by Bill O’Reilly apologists demonstrate quite clearly the integrity, maturity, and antagonistic communication style of his audience.
I don’t blame the posters, I blame a profit driven corporate media system that has coarsened American culture and fostered public ignorance. Americans reflect the role models that have a public platform. It is heartbreaking to watch a once great society reduced to crude barbarianism, defending torture, murder and government crimes. A culture that doesn’t read books, understand the scientific method, or posses critical thinking skills. A culture that believes Darwin’s theory is a conspiracy to destroy religious freedom and progressive taxing is Marxist ideology.
The annihilation of American democracy is almost complete and took place in a single generation out in the open under the guise of competing ideas and the First Amendment. However, it was never really about the First Amendment or competing ideas, it was about controlling ideas and limiting constitutional rights in order to advance corporate greed and lawlessness or what Ronald Reagan called economic freedom.
Bill O'Reilly has successfully performed his duties. He sold out America for money.
What was once a nice city is now the harbinger of some of the most atrocious crime(s) in the country. The home of the wrong reverend phelps, and now this. Shame on the people of Kansas and shame on O'Reily. Under most states hate crimes laws, even in Florida he can and should be prosecuted. However since our federal government, or the state of Kansas, doesn't see a need to protect all of the people of this country, even though we all have to pay for it in one way or another, these kinds of Zionist murders will continue. As long as O'Reily , Phelps, Isrealies, Limbaugh, Jones III, and the rest of the repugnantcrats/klansmen, are allowed to spew their fascist and racist remarks unfettered this country will continue in it's unabated tailspin into global destruction. As responsible journalists they have a moral duty to make sure they are only reporting the facts not some theocratic nonsense meant to arouse a puritanical segment of society into violence, then deny they have anything to do with it. For what purpose was Mr. O'Reily's putting Dr. Tiller into the national spotlight other than to have this man killed? Oops, I put responsible and journalist in the same sentence with O'Reily and Limbaugh, my bad. What scares me even more is that they are allowed to breed unchecked.
Predictably, the left will unload its trademark moral outrage on George Tiller's most vocal critic, FOX ratings-titan Bill O'Reilly. Obscured by the fog of tendentious rhetoric is a rare moment of clarity in a debate that is too often characterized by disingenuousness and cognitive dissonance. The people on the extremes of the abortion controversy have staked out positions that strike those of us situated in the ideological center as downright bizarre. When pro-lifers insist on referring to fertized eggs as "babies," people who care about the language, if nothing else, shake their heads. But George Tiller killed babies. That statement is as indisputable as anything in our polarized, mindlessly partisan society can be nowadays. So, after we condemn the zealot who placed himself above the laws of the land and invaded a church to commit an act of violence, what do we say about other zealots who who shrieked that George Bush and Dick Cheney were mass-murderers with the blood of thousands on their hands? Would the people huffing and puffing about Tiller's murder produce more than ritualistic tut-tuts and a trickle of crocodile tears at the news of Cheney's assassination? We know what leftist darling Bill Maher thinks about that, don't we?
Nobody really likes him, just stop watching his stupid show and eventually it will be canceled. GTFO Bill!
He's a joke!
Why people buy into his bulls**t? I'll never understand that one.
1 down, 1 million to go.
O'Reilly and his ilk and the majority of the Christian right only confirm my atheism as valid. They were my "converters".
I do believe that any person who uses a public forum - under the guise of 'freedom of speech' - to advocate the destruction of another person is contemptible and immoral to the nth degree and proof that intelligence(?)and morality can be mutually exclusive!
On a lighter vein...
Were a person driving down a street in a city where Mr. O'Reilly has taken up residence; and said driver, with no cognitive impairment, notices that self-same O'Reilly jaywalking in front of that self-same driver - I do believe that the continued sanity of the driver would be in jeopardy due to the dichotomy this situation would impose upon the driver - does he use the brake pedal to impede the forward progress of his vehicle, or does he hit the gas to increase its acceleration?
Personally, I can't see the problem!
This is in response to the following post by TM Devil:
Were a person driving down a street in a city where Mr. O'Reilly has taken up residence; and said driver, with no cognitive impairment, notices that self-same O'Reilly jaywalking in front of that self-same driver - I do believe that the continued sanity of the driver would be in jeopardy due to the dichotomy this situation would impose upon the driver - does he use the brake pedal to impede the forward progress of his vehicle, or does he hit the gas to increase its acceleration?
Personally, I can't see the problem!
MY QUESTION TO TM Devil is: how do you feel you are any better than the person you attempt to villify?
And, for your information, were it not for the abuse of her powers as governor of the state of Kansas (Kathleen Sebelius) Tiller would have been in prison where he belonged and might be alive today so if anyone is responsible for the demise of Tiller I suggest that the newly appointed Secretary of Health and Human Services (another big mistake) take a good look in the mirror.