The larger question is why this person (O'Reilly) is on television.

Baby killers are welcome as advertised cuz infanticide is officially approved.

Although I just glanced article and read a few radical left wing blogs, salon.com still qualifies as a great source of people like George Soros. I don't approve of the killing of a Doctor. I haven't yet heard O'Reilly's pitch but Salon.com is quick like always to critize anyone who disagree with their far left agenda.

The talk about the right inflaming, passion and all those bad sounding names about conservatives talking the truth.

I'd like a little information from Salon.com about the Black Panthers intimiding voters. How about the filthy crooked left wing ACORN supported by my taxpayer dollars?

How about wild left wing spending of our children and grandchilrens future incomes.

The Florida election of Bush in 2000 was crooked but, according to the far left, but what about Al Franken in last year's election. Probabaly okay, the left are expert at getting their way.

How about all the left wing hate machines? I suppose all these readers get their hate from MSNBC where left wing hate is spewed in generous volumes.

I am Deeply stunned at the reactions towards O'Reilly, this time...Personally I think we are all capable of being rude, loud and just as partial as O'reilly. I do not agree with O' 85 percent of the time, but some times this man has a point

I do not believe that calling someone who practices late term abortions a murderer as form of instigation to kill that person. In fact we might be able to say that this person has instigated his own label by carrying out late term abortions which some of people do consider murder.

Nazi's believed in several ideas, one of these ideas was eugenics, anyone who is brown haired, brown eyed, red haired, Hispanic, Asian, Indian, Romanian, Jewish, chines, Japanese, handicapped in any way, and basically not white, blond and with light eyes was considered by the Germans not worthy of living. THESE NAZI'S AT LEAST HAD A REASON to kill babies, children, women, men and the elderly. these are peoples kids, brothers, sisters, mothers, fathers, grandpa's and grandma's.

On the other HAND

In the Great America, with the aid of Margaret Sanger who believed in "Negative eugenic, we allowed to prosper and create centers to promote protection and birth control. no problem...

however

with abortion and late term abortion...let us define them...

let us compare sticking a vacuum into back of a fetuses head, then slurping its brains up to Nazi's Eugenics program... I Do not see the difference... plus at least the NAZI's Had a Reason... these American babies get removed from the uterus with one usual reason being that the" I'm not responsible enough to take care of it, but i am responsible enough to have an abortion."

Now... as for my experience..

i am a 22 year old Hispanic man, unfortunately made poor choices, and i live with that regret, which is why i Promote that O Rielly is right about Tiller the Baby Killer. but i do not believe that this man should have been slain, no way! his judgment is perhaps found in the afterlife where one day we will all be.

One can only hope that Dr. Tiller’s tragic assassination will force Mr. O’Reilly and his broadcast kinsmen to take another look at the effect their words can have. When you call a man a baby murderer over and over again across a period of years it becomes more and more likely that someone will take you literally and take citizen action to slow down the holocaust.

This is neither the place nor the time to argue the issue of abortion and all of the issues that are pulled into the arena of public debate; it is a day to say a prayer for Dr. Tiller and his family, a day to express sympathy to them for his loss. We do not know what Mr. O’Reilly will say tonight but likely he will join the rest of the right wing expressing his condolences and condemning murder as an expression of political debate.

All that is well and good but it does not even begin to erase years of the pure hate that has been brought down on anyone who sees the subject of abortion as anything but evil incarnate. Words have consequence and those with a public forum while having the right to say whatever they please also have a responsibility to prevent debate from degenerating into vigilantism.

I know you think you're clever, but you miss the point when you say Salon's remarks against O'Reilly are equivalent to O'Reilly's remarks against Tiller. See, Big Guy, the difference is that Salon doesn't demonize O'Reilly and doesn't say (or even imply) that he's evil. Salon doesn't advocate (or even suggest) going outside the law to correct O'Reilly's wrong or say (or imply) that he deserves divine retribution for his deeds. Salon DOES recognize the difference between hate speech and free speech, which, it seems, you do not.

Salon may not, but it's readers do. Just as I am sure the leaders of anti-abortion groups are careful to keep their rhetoric legal. But read the letters here and elsewhere - if a Salon letter-writer decided to gun down a Catholic Priest, there would be ample evidence to suggest that this place gave rise to incitement to violence. I have seen many posts that advocate going outside the law to rid America of Christians. I have seen many posts that describe Christians and Catholics as evil, as holding back humanity, as needing to be strangled with someone's entrails.

This guy is sick, and because he is sick, it does not mean that those who share his views on abortion are potential terrorists. Just as those who view GW Bush as a war criminal are not terrorists.

I am reminded of the movie Accused where the men who encouraged the rapists of a young woman were also charged with a crime and found guilty. O'Reilly is guilty of a crime here and should be held accountable for his actions. His venomous hate-spewing self-righteous proclamations against Dr. Tiller make O'Reilly a co-conspirator in murder.