Letters posted here are associated with the following article:

4
Letters
Wednesday, May 6, 2009 12:00 AM

"Nuclear weapons are not Kalashnikovs"

Prior to his meeting with Obama, Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari discusses his country's nuclear arsenal, failed peace talks with the Taliban and the whereabouts of Osama bin Laden.

The letters thread is now closed.

View:
Wednesday, May 6, 2009 12:41 PM

Here are my questions

Your wife, Benazir Bhutto, who was assassinated by terrorists, thought she could solve Pakistan's Pushtunistan problem by arming the Afghan Pushtun madrassa students in Peshawar and sending them in to take Kabul and restore order to Afghanistan so that the huge number of Afghan refugees setting down roots in Pakistan would finally go home and relieve the demographic pressure from your northern border.

Do you ever wish you could go back in time and advise her against this so-called brilliant strategy?

How do you feel about the threat of Pushtunistan now? Did your wife's machinations prevent Pushtunistan from arising or did she ensure that eventually the Taliban would spread to Pakistan and threaten to render your country's northern border purely a geographer's construct?

Do you think it will always be true that political reforms in Kabul will inevitably lead to Pushtun trouble on your country's northern border?

Is there any way that you can see to break this cycle of political reform and tribal revolt that has been happening in Afghanistan since the early century?

Wednesday, May 6, 2009 12:43 PM

Erratum

Is there any way that you can see to break this cycle of political reform and tribal revolt that has been happening in Afghanistan since the early 20th century?

Wednesday, May 6, 2009 12:53 PM

There are two types of Pakistani leaders

Placeholders and dictators. Zardari is a placeholder. The threat that 'if democracy fails anything can happen (vis a vis nuclear weapons)' followed up by a breezy "these things are complicated there is no button to push' sounds like the frantic desperation of a man soon to be deposed in a country that's plummeting into civil war.

Good luck with all of that. The west needs to accept that Pakistan will implode, that their nuclear weapons will go out of control and fall into the Taliban's hands, and that, as they say, is that. All the west should do is back away and let the fallout where it may. If that means nuclear strikes on Israel. Fine, we can all agree that's a good thing. If there are nucleare strikes anywhere else in the region, that's not a good thing but at least we won't be there to get blamed for it or harmed by it.

Thursday, May 7, 2009 06:25 PM

Indeed, nuclear weapons are not Kalashnikovs...

As discussed here:

http://open.salon.com/blog/kanuk/2009/05/04/can_the_taliban_take_over_pakistans_nuclear_arsenal

and here:

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=13494

Most Active Letters Threads

740

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
397

Do Obama officials know what his Afghanistan plan is?

What explains the completely contradictory statements from key aides on a central plank of the war strategy?
392

America's regression

It's almost impossible to find a nation with as many torture advocates as the U.S. has.
312

Palin: Birthers have "fair question" about Obama

Of Obama birth, the ex-governor says, "the public is still, rightfully, making it an issue" (Updated)
211

The poster boy for progressive self-delusion

Read Hayden's 2008 Obama endorsement to remember the way the left sold our centrist president to itself

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon