Read other letters about this article
Remember the argument that McCain showed a clear lack of decision making ability by selecting Palin as his VP candidate?
I assume the editorial staff at Salon thinks otherwise. What else would they write about had McCain not picked her?
1) Maybe Charlie Rangel's IRS problems? . . . did you see that he paid his back taxes, less the fines and interest that ordinary Americans would have pay in similar circumstances? If Charlie can't understand the tax code, why is he given the job of writing it? Is that an example of Pelosi acting as an effective manager? Give the job to the crook?
2) Maybe Salon could write about Biden's opinion regarding obama's recent ads attacking McCain. Biden said they are terrible.
3) Maybe Salon could write about Hillary's recent comments about Iran. She sounds tougher than Winston Curchill. Let the bombing begin.
Nah, stick with Sarah Palin. I don't expect honesty from Salon, and I'm happy to see these attacks working against your end goal.