- Top Features:
- War Room
- Glenn Greenwald
- Broadsheet
- Joan Walsh
- Camille Paglia
- Since You Asked
- Follow Salon:
Read other letters about this article
It's odd: the hit piece listed makes two main attacks on Palin - that she is anti-gay, and that she tried to push creationism in the school curriculum - yet the article actually offers no proof of either accusation.
AP cleared Palin of the accusation of book banning (note: the book is listed on Amazon for $456.00, no less, which is a little bizarre), so that's false. Second, the implication about injecting creationism into school isn't supported by any of Munger's comments: she's described as believing in creationism, but not of actually pushing it anywhere.
So I'm confused: isn't this actionable slander? Or is the hit piece written sufficiently vaguely so as to avoid legal action?
Geoff
