- Top Features:
- War Room
- Glenn Greenwald
- Broadsheet
- Joan Walsh
- Camille Paglia
- Since You Asked
- Follow Salon:
Read other letters about this article
Xanthro-Should I assume in the future that your grasp of the subject matter is about that of a sixth grader?
You're the brain-dead neocon who think a pound is more than a ton. A mistake a sixth-grader wouldn't make.
Your bible-school lack-of-education serves you badly, wingnut.
-- Godot.
It's quite apparent that I'm far more educated about this subject than you are.
Really, your post here is that of a sixth-grader just calling people names. It address no points, it advances no points, it's a sign of surrender and abject inability to comprehend the subject matter at hand.
While I'm not adverse to a little name calling and needling, while a post consists wholly of such things, it's the sign of a little mind.
Again, your claim was that the US could destroy all life on Earth. That is incorrect.
You've attempt to argue that yield is linear in terms of destructive capability, despite being given fireball radius of various devices.
It's clear you are wrong, and have no idea what thermonuclear devices are past a comic book level of understanding.
