This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Wednesday, September 3, 2008 12:00 AM

McCain: No, really, we vetted her!

As revelations about Sarah Palin mount, the McCain team scrambles to dispel reports that they didn't know what they were getting into.

Read other letters about this article

  • Tuesday, September 2, 2008 11:02 PM

    Vetting Sarah Palin

    John McCain’s selection of Sarah Palin as Vice-President raises a number of questions:

    John McCain is the oldest nominee in history for the office of President. While doctors from the Mayo Clinic say that he is reasonably healthy for his age, he is more likely to experience health problems than a fit male who is 20 years younger. That is why his pick of Sarah Palin truly matters. Is SHE presidential material?

    Sarah Palin is being praised because she knowingly decided to give birth to a child, four and a half months ago, who has Down Syndrome. Her son, Trig, is classified as a special needs child. But apparently such a child who at this critical, formative stage in his development, may have a special need for an attentive mother, is not going to have that need fulfilled. His mother is off running as a Republican Vice-President and she is receiving praise for being a “pro-life” politician. Is this the best that a truly loving mother can do? Abandon her child to others, while she pursues a political career?

    Sarah Palin, we are told, opposes sex education in public schools. Apparently she did not do a first-rate job of sex education in private either. Her 17-year-old daughter is now an unwed mother-to-be. This dubious achievement is now being hailed by social conservatives as proving, once again, how “pro-life” the Palins are. Bristol’s boyfriend, Levi Johnson, used to have a YouTube page in which he reportedly said he did not want to have children and described himself as “a f**king redneck”. (The website recently disappeared).

    One reasonable question would be: has this young couple been “bought off” for political reasons? (Along the lines of John Edwards’ mistress receiving a great deal of money to keep scandal at bay.) Someone should look into the possibility at least. The Republicans have a lot riding on protecting McCain’s reputation during a close election race.

    Time will tell how long this teenage romance will last… but those who run McCain’s campaign care that the marriage looks as respectable as a shotgun wedding ever can and that it endures until the election has taken place

    No one who was in favor of voting for Hillary Clinton could possibly think of Sarah Palin as an equivalent, simply because she is a woman. Whatever McCain’s reasons for choosing her as a running mate, he should not mind if the national press vets Palin for a second time, assuming she has nothing to hide.

Most Active Letters Threads

419

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
195

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
111

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again
56

Police to talk to Woods

Early morning crash raises questions, and revives tabloid speculation

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon