- Top Features:
- War Room
- Glenn Greenwald
- Broadsheet
- Joan Walsh
- Camille Paglia
- Since You Asked
- Follow Salon:
Read other letters about this article
As much as I cannot stand the smug, morally superior, do as I say, not as I do religious zealots that seem to fill the ranks of the GOP these days telling the parents of a pregnant 17 year old that the pregnancy is their fault is asinine. Clearly you don't have a seventeen year old or where never 17 yourself.
Bristol is responsible for her pregnancy as is the man she had sex with. Now one could argue that this might be a case of teenage rebellion against some overly protective parents who preached the abstinence bit too strongly. However, you'd have to ask Bristol if that was her intent.
Her daughter's pregnancy should only be used to shine a light on how abstinence only programs fail more than they succeed and endanger kids to STD's and unwanted pregnancies by not educating them. We should look at it in the larger context of will VP Palin unduly influence Prez McCain to withhold federal funding for schools which have a rounded sex education program and only fund those who have a singular abstinence only one? In what other areas will she try to press her personal religious views on the rest of us?
I would have hoped the failed Bush administration would have shown the people the failings of pseudo-theocracies in America but clearly the religious monster is a hydra and it will take more than the chopping off of one head to defeat it.
