This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Wednesday, August 27, 2008 12:00 AM

"No way, no how, no McCain"

Hillary Clinton targets the Republicans -- and her loyalists who have been unwilling to give up the good fight.

Read other letters about this article

  • Wednesday, August 27, 2008 02:52 PM

    white cat--I don't always do this but I just checked your letter history and found this you wrote a few months ago:

    Those who say they won't vote for Clinton if she is the nominee...

    [Read the article: Betting little in Las Vegas]

    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    Remind me of little kids who threaten to hold their breath until they get their way. What a childish reaction. What do you think such declarations will gain you? Are we supposed to nominate "anyone but Hillary" for fear that we'll lose your precious vote if we don't? How ridiculous.

    You aren't Democrats, that's for sure. You're more like Naderites, letting the perfect be the enemy of the good - just look how that turned out. Anyone who thinks another four to eight years of destructive, divisive, irresponsible, warmongering, corrupt Republican rule is better than Hillary as president is someone who isn't worth having on our side.

    Go ahead, hold your breath, kick your heels, have your little tantrum. Pardon us if we ignore you until you realize you can't get exactly what you want every time with those tactics. Most children do come to realize that - you just haven't reached that stage of maturity yet.

    * * *

    You are comlaining about a lack of respect and of bigotry, yet in this post you show both toward Obama's Democratic supporters.

Most Active Letters Threads

426

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
263

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
111

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again
57

Police to talk to Woods

Early morning crash raises questions, and revives tabloid speculation

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon