Ah, yes, the Not-Really-Democrats Clinton supporters are out in force.
Hey Clinton supporters! Why do you want McCain to win?
Why do you hate America?
What's your litmus for real democrats? Gimme the straight from the cool school.
Why do you hate the measured response?
Why do you love hyperbole?
Why don't you try thinking for once,
And come off much more worldly?
Even before he won in 1992 the right has absolutely been fixated on portraying this family as the devil! I have no sympathy for Hillary holdouts or PUMAS (cough! right wing troll organization! cough!) but even I give the actual Clintons more credit then trying to steal the show. I'm beginning to think this has absolutely nothing to do with Obama and the right is just hoping that they can get in one last shot at the Clintons before they ride away into the sunset. Are they hoping that the DNC will magically change it's mind and put her on the ticket at the last minute? If so, then the right really is as delusional as I thought.
Doesn't anyone think it's odd that in the nearly 20 years this family has been in the spotlight none of these Clinton obsessees has been able to give a clear answer to what it is they have a problem with? GQ had an article a few months back about a group of Hillary haters and even after sitting down and interviewing them the most they could get out of them was the same old "I can see into her soul and it's evil!" shit. Okay, so they hate "liberals" and democrats, but let's be honest, Bill was hardly the most liberal president. If anything he capitulated a hell of a lot more then he should. So what is this really about? Where is this irrational hatred coming from? What is it about this family that stirs up so many negative emotions?
Now we have drama among our own (though it's debatable how many are actual Clinton supporters and aren't just right wing plants trying to stir up trouble) because of the emotions this family stirs up. But at least I don't blame them for most of this (though Hillary still should have seen the train coming sooner then she did IMHO). I hate to say it but I kind of hope they go away just to be rid of the drama. Poor Chelsea better look out if she ever decides to follow in her parents shoes, she may be the next to be called the anti-christ. Though given that the right has never specified why they hate her folks so much, she may not be able to avoid the label no matter what she does.
shukran, merci, thanks.
Gripe up the hype limo.
Which makes you at least five times smarter than Maureen Dowd. I actually wish you were writing for the NYT instead.
I repeat
There will be no Hillary highjack
don't get jacked by hacks.
Jesus, Mary and Joseph. I made an earlier comment that Barack Obama is raising $55 MILLION DOLLARS a Month just to get his skinny black ass elected into the most unforgiving job on the planet. What a waste of time and resources. I say let Bush stay in for the next 20 years with the caveat that he can not nominate another justice to the Supreme Court. Let Obama continue to raise his-going to the calculator, I am not Spock-$660 MILLION annual dollars and New Orleans gets year One just because they need it and at Mardi Gras every womean flashes her tits. Education gets years two and three. Public Dildo education gets $100 million in year 4 with the rest going to diapers and speed and wine for the homeless. Hey, it's like the Olympics. Let's celebrate. Year 5, always Liberace's favorite number, every first born female-yeah, yeah, I know...-gets a free piano in the hope that sheer numbers can duprecipricate a Mozart lots of luck Yank and so on you get the picture. We can have a suggestions contest for years 6-20.
I still think the whole thing is a crock of shit but don't want to step on the toes of those who still think they can make a difference. Have a nice day.
I bash the Clintons when they deserve it, but I thought Hillary's concession speech was pretty gracious. So I'm not gonna ascribe any evil intent 'till I see the proof.
Keep in mind that some of the crap in the campaign probably came from people like Mark Penn. She should have trusted her own judgment rather than listening to that moron. That's the real lesson, I think.
Wasn't that cathartic?
Which makes you at least five times smarter than Maureen Dowd.
That's the truth. On this we agree 100%.
Here is what is going to come out of the Democratic Convention.
If either Clinton gives a great speech, the spin will be that he or she is trying to upstage Obama like Kennedy did to Carter in 1980, and is really just positioning herself for 2012.
If the Clinton's give average speeches, the spin will be they aren't behind Obama and are really setting themselves up for 2012.
See the commonality there?
No matter what the Clintons or Clinton delegates do, the post convention story is going to be about them, and not about Obama.
Bill was hardly the most liberal president. If anything he capitulated a hell of a lot more then he should. So what is this really about? Where is this irrational hatred coming from? What is it about this family that stirs up so many negative emotions?
Because Bill's the only two term Dem President in last five decades, and his approval ratings on his worst day were higher than Shrub's have been for the last three years.
Don't worry, though; If BO makes it to the White House, the Republicans will hate him just as Bill, if not more so.
Is it me, or is the GOP's shouting "I hope you put the Clintons on!" remind you of Brer Rabbit's "Don't throw me in that briar patch!"?
Much of the initial coverage about Fort Hood turned out to be wrong. Is there anything wrong with that?
The accountability imposed by another country for the CIA's kidnapping and torture reveals much about our own.
Fox News' morning show plays to type, talking about whether Muslims in the Army should face "special debriefings"
The Maine fight was supposed to be the dress rehearsal for repealing California's Prop. 8 -- but gay marriage lost
Once one obtains Seriousness credentials in the Washington media, they are irrevocable no matter one's conduct.
Salon headlines in your mailbox