Site Presented By
Sunday, Nov 8, 2009
Adolf Hitler is alive and well in the basement of the White House and writing emails for McBush
"The Obama campaign did not accuse the Clintons of "racism" for the Lyndon Johnson stuff, sorry."
Sorry. I "lied." They said Hillary "denigrated" MLK. Much better?
We won't even mention the "lower staff memo" outlining all the ways they could cry "racism" against the Clintons. I suppose that's a "lie" too. As I've said before, the greatest threat to Obama losing this election is from his "supporters."
It's an anti-Obama campaign drawn straight from a Chick tract.
I must get two of these a day. My views are know to be consevative. Many times, I just delete them on other occassions I check it out and pass on that it's BS.
I got this one today. See if you can Debunk it.
"JACK WHEELER is a brilliant man who was the author of
Reagan's strategy to break the back of the Soviet
Union with the star wars race and expose their inner
weakness. For years he wrote a weekly intelligence
update that was extremely interesting and well
structured and informed. He consults(ed) with several
mega corporations on global trends and the future,
etc. I think he is in semi-retirement now. He is a
true patriot with a no-nonsense approach to
everything. He is also a somewhat well known mountain
climber and adventurer.
Written by Dr. Jack Wheeler
The O-man, Barack Hussein Obama, is an eloquently
tailored empty suit. No resume, no accomplishments,
no experience, no original ideas, no understanding of
how the economy works, no understanding of how the
world works, nothing but abstract empty rhetoric
devoid of real substance.
He has no real identity. He is half-white, which he
rejects. The rest of him is mostly Arab, which he
hides but is disclosed by his non-African Arabic
surname and his Arabic first and middle names as a way
to triply proclaim his Arabic parentage to people in
Kenya . Only a small part of him is African Black from
his Luo grandmother, which he pretends he is
exclusively.
What he isn't, not a genetic drop of, is
'African-American,' the descendant of enslaved
Africans brought to America chained in slave ships.
He hasn't a single ancestor who was a slave. Instead,
his Arab ancestors were slave owners. Slave-trading
was the main Arab business in East Africa for
centuries until the British ended it.
Let that sink in: Obama is not the descendant of
slaves, he is the descendant of slave owners. Thus he
makes the perfect Liberal Messiah.
It's something Hillary doesn't understand - how some
complete neophyte came out of the blue and stole the
Dem nomination from her. Obamamania is beyond
politics and reason. It is a true religious cult,
whose adherents reject Christianity yet still believe
in Original Sin, transferring it from the evil of
being human to the evil of being white.
Thus Obama has become the white liberals' Christ,
offering absolution from the Sin of Being White. There
is no reason or logic behind it, no faults or flaws of
his can diminish it, no arguments Hillary could make
of any kind can be effective against it. The
absurdity of Hypocrisy Clothed In Human Flesh being
their Savior is all the more cause for liberals to
worship him: Credo quia absurdum, I believe it because
it is absurd.
Thank heavens that the voting majority of Americans
remain Christian and are in no desperate need of a
phony savior.
His candidacy is ridiculous and should not be taken
seriously by any thinking American."
This isn't a smear-- there is some truth to Michelle Obama being racist--- their church and her writings and statements-- "first time I have been proud to be american!!"Open your eyes America. We can not elect a president based on affirmative action- he doesn't have the qualifications.
You dudes have a lot of free time on your hands.
"What you've just emailed is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever seen. At no point in your rambling, incoherent email were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in your address book is now dumber for having read it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."
Censorship in the context of these forums would involve someone in a position of authority screening every post submitted to a thread and deciding which ones fit the Salon "standards" and allowing only those to be published.
What I proposed was that Salon give me a tool similar to the one I have on my satellite TV receiver that lets me pick and choose which channels are listed and which are not when I scan through the listings for something to watch.
Instead of having to scan through literally hundreds of channels that seldom if ever offer anything of the slightest interest to me in order to discover what's on the few channels that fairly regularly have something on offer that amuses or informs me, I can set it up so that the one's I'm interested in are the only channels I have to scan through to perhaps find something I'll want to see.
When I decide I don't want to have to skim through, say, the Military channel and something called "Speed" and a half-dozen cooking channels to go from Animal Planet to BBC America, my removing them from my list doesn't take them off the air. If you like those channels and want to watch them at your house, they're still there.
That's all I proposed; a tool to help me get to what I think might be worth my time without having to wade through a bunch of posts from people that I've decided don't have anything of value to offer me. Removing those "channels" from my menu doesn't make them unavailable to anybody but me. That would be censorship.
As the Limbaugh fan base has become more active on the progressive web sites, more and more sites are offering an "ignore this person" option on their discussion forums. This is absolutely no different from the SPAM filter I'll bet you, yourself, have on your email account. It gives you control to choose what mail makes it to your inbox and what doesn't.
Review: Censorship = one person/body preventing another from having access to information. Choice = one person deciding for themselves what appears on their monitor and what doesn't.
If you still don't get it and think that choice is censorship, I give up.
Much of the initial coverage about Fort Hood turned out to be wrong. Is there anything wrong with that?
The accountability imposed by another country for the CIA's kidnapping and torture reveals much about our own.
Fox News' morning show plays to type, talking about whether Muslims in the Army should face "special debriefings"
The survivor and author is upset about comparisons some on the right are making to genocide
Once seen as a lunatic fringe, reactionary anti-women groups are courting respectability
Salon headlines in your mailbox
