Site Presented By
Sunday, Nov 8, 2009
Please.
Girlfriend's addicted to c@ck.
And Edward's is nuthin but a hound dog.
Yeah, that kind of hound.
Same old story. Same old played-out, desperate people who want to be special so bad they'll do just about anything. With anyone. Anywhere, anytime. Especially at the worst time.
These are so dreary.
What happened to Salon's supposed standards of quality journalism? What happened to NYU's? Objectivity, balance, tone of voice? Were your editors AWOL en masse?
Your resident hack-in-training needs to be dispatched to the National Enquirer if this is the best attempt at reportage that he can deliver to the Salon site. Instead of an incisive piece of writing, he barely succeeded in creating a hatchet job, though his blade proved rather dull. In my granny's time, they called this muck racking.
This may not be the fame she sought, but the world is getting to know a bit more about her, flaws & all. The Zelda reference resonated. She seems in many ways larger than life, iconic in ways, yet in others totally empathetic. When some of her past ...indiscretions... with all that 80s stuff... were described, I began to think ...if she were a man, and instead of the Richard Gere & the Dalai Lama she had found a televangelist & JC, she might just have what it takes to be president. :)
Isn't she living the American Dream? Living large, taking risks, and picking yourself up, learning from your mistakes and moving on? I hope for her sake, the media spotlight moves on & she can become yet another pop-culture footnote and get on with her life. However, hers is such a fascinating story, it may be a while.
Frances McDormand in Fargo. There i wrote it , it's been bugging me for days - that feeling of "she looks so famialiar, "
First of all who is this jouvenal person? Is that supposed to be a cute little pun? The article was indeed juvenile. It had no new information in it at all--- the background research consisted of using google. It's like being in 5th grade and copying out of the encyclopedia.
Secondly, why "Get Rielle?" It doesn't get rielle. Did they mean that in the sense of she is worthy for attack? As in let's all get her? Or did they mean it in the sense of "get THIS chick!" as in she is too ridiculous to be believed. Either way, the article doesn't live up to its title.
I think this woman should be targeted by the media (tabloid or otherwise) because she makes no bones about the fact that she decided she was going to get herself a rich and pwoerfufl man, she was going to "manifest" it in her life, and then she did just that. John Edwards was an idiot and no one has said anything about whether she's jsut the latest flavor of the month or not, but the point is, she is a grown (if stupid) woman who should be held accountable for her tacky behavior.
The true tragedy is that she's brought a child into all of this, permanently affecting the lives of John Edwards' family forever and certainly, creating a mess for that poor kid.
So go ahead---get Rielle. But do it well for god's sake. School is about to start and the fifth graders will be in short supply.
Much of the initial coverage about Fort Hood turned out to be wrong. Is there anything wrong with that?
The accountability imposed by another country for the CIA's kidnapping and torture reveals much about our own.
Fox News' morning show plays to type, talking about whether Muslims in the Army should face "special debriefings"
219 Democrats and one Republican join in favor of the legislation, which passed by a narrow margin
The survivor and author is upset about comparisons some on the right are making to genocide
Salon headlines in your mailbox
