- Top Features:
- War Room
- Glenn Greenwald
- Broadsheet
- Joan Walsh
- Camille Paglia
- Since You Asked
- Follow Salon:
Read other letters about this article
It would be nice if the author of one piece - in this case the one about Mr McCain's stand on technology and free markets - could get their analysis straight.
Four contradictory quotes from the article:
- McCain had to choose whether to be pro-competition or pro-big business. In most instances, he chose the latter route [...]
- [...] Government can do no good in telecom policy. "McCain is a pure free-market ideologue," said Mark Cooper.
- More recently, McCain has sided with the telecom industry in the network neutrality debate.
- McCain sided against competition and opposed Markey's legislation.
So, what is McCain, a free market ideologue, which entails competition, or a protectionist in favour of big companies, which entails being against smaller business [Mom-and-Pop] and the consumer?
As with the completely warped political dictionary of the USA - liberal meaning leftist radical, conservative being a right-wing radical - there seems to be more than just a little confusion when it comes to economic and socio-economic debate.
BTW, I still have to stumble upon the free market touter, who is against regulations. A necessary component of a completely free market is the fully informed participant - a phantom in the real world, only used in theoretical discussions. Only if you disregard this can you think a free market in reality should be free of regulations. Please, could people stop misapprehending Adam Smith and David Ricardo.
