This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Monday, August 4, 2008 12:00 AM

Would Obama prosecute the Bush administration for torture?

Obama's brain trust wants to form a commission on torture and call Bush officials as witnesses, but put off prosecutions -- if any -- till a second term.

Read other letters about this article

  • Monday, August 4, 2008 11:36 AM

    Actually, the rules are quite clear

    The idea of launching a totally new "solution" by formulating and creating Truth Commissions sounds about as legal and desirable as coming up with a totally new "solution" for terrorists by formulating and creating Military Commissions.

    The international law is quite clear. If this country feels it cannot prosecute, it is to give the cases over to a neutral country or to the Hague for prosecution. A Truth Commission, especially one which immunizes the perpetrators in exchange for their information, is just another version of a cover-up. This isn't a political matter, and it isn't just a matter for which only the U.S. has juridiction. Torture is required to be investigated, prosecuted, and punished, and if the U.S. doesn't do it, then any other country that signed the same international treaties we did can do so.

    This is just another indication that Obama and those who surround him are as capable of taking liberties with the law as the people currently in office. I don't find improvised the law any more comforting in the name of national unity than I did in the name of national security.

    Obama has a choice: prosecute or hand the cases over to another sovereign state or to the Hague for prosecution. I'm real sorry he doesn't want to mar the bright shiny paint job on his presidency with the muck of real world issues, but that's life. Maybe he should run for student council if he wants a job that keeps the paint shiny.

    From what I've seen about his attitude on this in Mark Benjamin's article and elsewhere, I have zero confidence at this point that the torture will even stop, or that all those tens of thousands of prisoners under U.S. control will see human rights at all. I see no indication of the wider goal of bringing the U.S. home again on international humanitarian law or international human rights law, I see less than zero hope that the U.S. will ever, ever again believe that the rights of an average person in a land far from our shores, or even the very existence of such a person, is something that an overfed, comfortable American should ever care about. I don't see Barack Obama as a message of hope, I see him as lacking the experience and the core values to do the right thing. His campaign and related Democrats email me more than once a day, and snail mail me at least once a week. These days they get only one response: No. I'm not supporting another guy who doesn't give a damn about right and wrong. Inspiring speeches don't make up for moral decrepitude.

Most Active Letters Threads

477

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
426

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
187

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
111

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon