Read other letters about this article
delosgatos has shown us the subtle difference between a "theory" and a "hypothesis".
The greenhouse hypothesis is just that: a yet to be validated hypothesis or postulation. GCMs (computer climate models) do not validate a hypothesis. It takes physically observed hard data to validate the greenhouse hypothesis, and this is lacking today.
To follow the lead article author's suggestion to base far-reaching and exremely costly policy decisions on an unproven hypothesis "just in case" is absurd.