- Top Features:
- War Room
- Glenn Greenwald
- Broadsheet
- Joan Walsh
- Camille Paglia
- Since You Asked
- Follow Salon:
Read other letters about this article
Xlp Thlplylp,
My point in posting these two articles is to demonstrate the futility of arguing the topic. The opposing “sides” see not only the topic presented, but the implications and policies that will naturally evolve if either camp emerges as dominant.
The global warming Alarmists will generally embrace the Socialistic mindset of the “solutions” to their problem.
Global warming Realists will oppose the theory and the erosion of liberties and freedoms.
I really don’t know what the answer is. It is clear that this argument is about political ideology that has adopted “science” as the catalyst. I don’t believe that there is such a thing as a politically neutral scientist…….(I could be wrong).
Both sides seem to have a strong marketing campaign in this arena to forward their respective political agenda.
Can we at least agree on this point?
