Read other letters about this article
yep, the AGW issue can't get past a couple of posts without bringing out the nuts who insist that the science isn't settled because some finding from 20 years ago is off by 10%, which opens the floodgates for the people on both sides whose posts would be evidence for institutionalizing them, followed up by the usual "Nyah nyah you'll never catch me" posts of those who for some reason think they've won a victory if they can actually deny things which are happening before their eyes, because reality isn't conforming to their ideological demands.