Site Presented By
Sunday, Nov 8, 2009
I think Romm is correctly arguing the consequences, but gets the remedy partially wrong because of class bias.
Who buys expensive hybrids? Wealthy people with money to spend 30,000 on a new car. But is that car more environmentally correct? Perhaps compared to an SUV, but what was the environmental cost of earning the money to buy either the SUV or the hybrid? Meanwhile, some of the cheapest cars get the best mpg, and don't have heavy metal batteries either.
I've had these same arguments with wealthy environmentalists on biodiesel. I pointed out that there wasn't enough waste cooking oil to fuel everyone's car (and in fact now theives are stealing it from restaurants due to short supply). Inevitably, running your biodiesel car takes cooking oil of some poor person's table. Technology fixes that exclude class-conscious economics are counterproductive to the environment because they undermine political support.
We need rationing. But you can't ration equitably without cap and trade. I'm not saying that all cap and trade systems are equitable (the sulfur scheme is not), but these trade systems CAN be equitable. Distribute the credits to the EVERYONE. Romm wants to let rich people, who consume the most, off the hook, plus have the government spend big bucks designing cars for them. That's class bias and is counterproductive to solving the very real climate crisis.
Similarly, carbon taxes MIGHT help the poor IF the government spends the money on reducing their burden.
Romm has it muddled: economically rewarding conservation will bring about conservation technologies OR reduced use. Simply creating more technologies is a tried and failed approach to environmental problems.
Much of the initial coverage about Fort Hood turned out to be wrong. Is there anything wrong with that?
The accountability imposed by another country for the CIA's kidnapping and torture reveals much about our own.
Fox News' morning show plays to type, talking about whether Muslims in the Army should face "special debriefings"
The survivor and author is upset about comparisons some on the right are making to genocide
Once seen as a lunatic fringe, reactionary anti-women groups are courting respectability
Salon headlines in your mailbox
