This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Wednesday, June 4, 2008 12:00 AM

Barack Obama's epic win

The young senator makes history not only in terms of race, while a determined Hillary Clinton delays the inevitable a bit longer.

Read other letters about this article

  • Wednesday, June 4, 2008 04:09 AM

    @Izziedie

    When you win a nomination, you don't wait to declare victory.

    And Walter Shapiro is not telling Clinton what she should be doing. Quite the opposite, in fact:

    Make no mistake, there has been a snarky tenor of criticism about Clinton's determination to stay the course through all the primaries. Every other presidential dreamer in her position had taken the fight to the convention (Ronald Reagan in 1976, Ted Kennedy in 1980, Gary Hart in 1984), but she has been demonized for hanging on until the first Tuesday in June.

    But to be fair to Obama supporters and the media--and despite the complaints of Clinton supporters--very few people have been calling on Clinton to drop out.

    What Obama supporters have criticized, and bitterly, is the tenor of Clinton's campaign, which is rather different from at least one of the predecessors cited. Gary Hart stayed in the race but stayed positive. Both Kennedy and Reagan were more bitter (though not as bitter as Clinton). And both Kennedy and Reagan (unlike Hart) are often seen as contributing to their party's loss the following November.

    The anger directed at Clinton and her supporters concerns the kind of campaign she's run, not her insistence on continuing to campaign. That doesn't mean that the accusations labeled at the Clinton camp are fair. But one cannot defend her simply by saying that she shouldn't have been forced to drop out. That's not the issue.

    There's another important difference from these earlier examples: when Carter in '80 and Mondale in '84 effectively clinched their nominations, long before the convention, the media said as much. Kennedy and Hart may not have been "demonized," but their candidacies weren't taken seriously once they had no real path to the nomination.

    Sen. Clinton reached that point in late February. You can't blame her campaign (and her supporters) for ignoring this fact. You can, however, blame the media for continuing to act as if she had a prayer of actually getting the nomination once Obama had an effectively insurmountable delegate lead.

Most Active Letters Threads

516

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
426

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
401

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
182

Bigotry wins in Switzerland

By voting to ban the construction of minarets, Switzerland apes the most extreme intolerance in the Muslim world

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon