- Top Features:
- War Room
- Glenn Greenwald
- Broadsheet
- Joan Walsh
- Camille Paglia
- Since You Asked
- Follow Salon:
Read other letters about this article
Hey Back,
I'm not sure where you're coming from with your "demand for a recount", but at least you should check your facts about how votes are held.
Oregon does not vote by caucus. Oregon holds a primary. Oregon is the ONLY state currently using all paper ballots, with signatures checked carefully, and with any questionable ballots being kicked out of the automated system for a well-vetted team of volunteers to count manually. It is a vote by mail system, where ballots go out to registered voters (and only those registered in a particular party get to vote for that party's candidates) and they have two weeks to sit with them, read the voter's pamphlet, attend the multiple rallies of both candidates (at least this time around, both Clinton and Obama were seen many times all around the state--with MUCH larger crowds for Obama, by the way), then go home and mark their ballot in complete privacy. This has increased voter turnout remarkably--especially among the elderly, disabled, or working class who are often targets of the massive vote manipulation efforts of Republicans in other states, and who have difficulty getting to a polling place and waiting in line on a single day.
It has NOT increased "underage" voting--that's a hell of an accusation, by the way!
Maybe what you are thinking of as "underage" in Oregon is the MASSIVE turnout of 18-20 something college students who are absolutely ready for Obama to blast past the "old-school" war generations and move us into a bit more cooperative approach to actually getting something done! Oh, and the Oregon Bus Project's incredible job of energizing these voters has also helped make the face of Oregon politics definitely "younger" than any state in the nation has seen in decades.
But, yes, they ARE all of voting age--and dying in wars age, too, which may also have them a bit more interested in Obama.
