Letters to the Editor

Letters posted here are associated with the following article:
If Obama wants to secure the nomination next week, he'll need to recapture the working-class voters who helped him rout Clinton in Wisconsin.
The letters thread is now closed.
  • Baloo's Mental Diarrhea

    You scribbled: Barack Hussein Obama: What is that accomplish for you when you use his middle name as an epithet! You're a fucking Republican tool, like that whino coward that McCain threw under the bus. Someone ought to throw you under a bus, literally! You are racist, ugly, and probably very fat. Go read a fucking Anne Rice novel or some shit like that, you fatass pig!--Baloo"

    Yeppers, nothing like hitting the target dead-center to bring out the racist trolls. Screen it, homie:

    Barack Hussein Obama IS his name...P & S. People refer to Hillary Rodham Clinton with all three of her names; Barack Hussein Obama is his complete name. Zip lip, fool; I liked it bettah when you just went k'caw.

    So, because I disagree with you I'm a Repub? I've been a Democrat for twenty years and contributed big dollars to the party and to individual candidates in that period. Yo b donkadonk, y'heah?

    Oooh, "racist, ugly and very fat"? There you go with mo' bay bay shit, Baloo. If I was as b fuggly as you, I'd stay inside.

    Matter of fact, why doncha just go kick rocks?

  • Obama and the local MSM in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Indiana

    Is there any difference in the MSM coverage Obama has gotten in these states? Newspaper endorsements? Local TV news, local talk shows? I would think this would be an important factor in his success or failure.

  • Focus on the End Game

    You're right about one thing in this piece, Mike. Wisconsin is an anomaly. "Progressive" there means unknown or better yet--not the status quo. That's what opened the door to Obama. It's reached the point of being a political culture of its own. The usual definitions and political identifications do not apply.

    It's closest to Northern California, but that's about it. I don't say that critically, but to use it as a way to guage what's going to happen in Indiana is a waste of electrons. North Carolina is another matter entirely.

    What I love about the local activists is they give themselves credit for the "campaign" when it's more impressive than that. How did they arrive at such a liberal consensus when so much of the rest of the country is trying to return to the 19th century?

    I think we're going to see the pattern that has already emerged continue; the stalemate will not be broken. The margin of victory in Indiana will be the most discussed since it follows Barack's bad news.

    The focus now is on the end game. The superdelegates, the convention, the ticket, the consequences of Fla. and Mi.,and whether or not the Dems can hold together. Does "progressive" mean "tolerance" or does it mean "third party?"

  • Obama Should Withdraw, While His Reputation Is Still Intact

    Well, OK not now, but after Indiana and NC if he doesn't do well. (If he does, my comments will be moot, I guess.)

    Why? If he doesn't do well in those states -- a loss in IN and a loss or narrow win in NC -- it will be shown that he can't win in the fall. Period.

    If he loses in the fall, he's gone for good. Same is true for Hillary, if she lost to McCain. The parties do not like to nominate previous losers. The Dems have lots of those, unfortunately. But if Obama withdraws "for the good of the party," he will have a good chance in future contests. Plus he will have more time to gain experience and put garbage like Wrightgate well behind him.

    Sometimes I wonder why Obama decided to run this time, knowing that Wright, etc. would emerge as a serious issue. The only answer I can come up with is that he has a towering ego and thought he could overcome all that trivia with the force of his personality. We'll see.

  • The missing piece

    This article misses the obvious. You assume that white working class people are all the same (you must be an elitist).

    Look at the map, look where Obama has won and where Hillary has won. He does exceptionally well from Illinois to the west coast, Hillary does exceptionally well from Ohio down to Kentucky.

    Indiana is right between these two strongholds, so I imagine we'll get something close to a tie.

  • @Mickey Kovars

    "I wonder why Obama decided to run this time...The only answer I can come up with is that he has a towering ego". maybe he thought the country needed him. that this was a crucial time. that we have gone down so far, economically, militarily, imperially in the sight of the world that if it lasted 4 more years of the same political culture (which hillary hasn't disappointed in applying), it would have reached an irrevocable "it's too late". but then, Obama is my candidate while Clinton is yours.

  • If either of these jokers loses to Insane in the McCain

    then we might as well declare the monarchy and be done with it.

  • Hillary

    Was great on O'Reilly last night.

  • this is news?

    Why on earth did either Mike Madden or Salon think the remarks in this piece are the least news-worthy? Talking heads have been trumpeting for weeks now that Obama needs to win working class whites, while lesser talking heads have been pointing out that he won them in Wisconsin (and actually elsewhere.) But you know what? I bet if Obama won Indiana by doing really really well with some other demographic, that would help his chances too.

  • have a little faith, Electro Robot!

    you remind me of, what was his name?, droopy dog.

  • Get your act together Democrats!

    The Democratic primary has thus far been fun, entertaining, annoying and at times ugly because of the wild partisanship of some. This thing is winding down and we will have a nominee soon. If the people who support either Hillary or Obama have a brain in their heads cut out the bashing! We need to get ready to back the Democratic nominee to defeat the Republicans. All of this B/S and competitiveness will be nothing but a meaningless exercise in futility if we do not unite and win the election.

    Enough is enough!

    Victory for the Democrats in 2008

  • What We Need

    Is a 40 plus state, 400 plus electoral college vote victory. A total repudiation of republicanism. That's never happened. That ain't gonna happen this time. Things are bad, but not that bad. So we put up Obama as the sacrificial lamb this time, a lot of Hillary voters either not participating or voting for McCain. Then Hillary gets the huge win in 2012.