Letters to the Editor
-
More Superdelegates for Obama?
Super-duper!
-
the gop (and let's face it. it's their's to "give" currently) will never give anything
As if it was their's to give. this nation was founded by liberals. Not capitalists. Not fascists. Not conservatives. Liberals.
The gop fascists who will hijack this countries GOVERNMENT, clinton included, will never give it up. they will not "give" what has always been the american's people birthright. They may have hijacked america.
But if we don't take it back, and pity them, we will never get back the american ideal this great nation was founded on. They do have "power". Power that is feating. They can be voted out. In voting, the american people have the stregnth and power. If we don't use it we don't have it. What is george bush's approval? What is congress's (the congress led by clinton-ites who enable the gop rather than being an oppostion party)? We put the dnc in power, what did they do? What they said, or enable the gop.
They gop, clinton included, are not going to give up their hijacked power. We must take it back from them. And do so without pity or fear. to not give the gop the irrelevance they earned does them no favors. And they only worsen as their ticks get dug in. the machine. the kick back machine. Used to be called treason. now treason is american politics. doesn't have to be that way.
Once the american people have control of our govenrment again the gop will never get it back. Who will choose slavery when they are free. that is the fight. to show the stupid morons, that we call americans, that it doesn't have to be this way. And who's to balme for making america this way. that's it. Easy as pie, right? if we can get the sabotuers either out or labeled as such. Dean, reid, pelosi, kerry, clinton, kenneddy. Other than feed the gop, what do they do for us? Tiem for loyality to men and women is over. Tiem for loyality to america and it's principel again. And screw anyone who would tell you differantly. :)
Keep your chin up. We got them by the ba*ls. they know it. that is why they have no choice but to openly sabotage the opposition party. that is a blod move, showing the world we are a one party govenrment. Like alwyas teh unintended conseqeunces will be the worse, for the gop.
they were labeled as fascists, fine. Then thei r"news" was labeled as propoganda. off that we won 06. did they improve? did they fix their fascism and propoganda, or did they worsen? Now they show the country and world this is a one party government? this will backfire like the rest of their fascist attempts. Fret not. It;'s only a matter of time. Tehy don't dare to steal this election from obama, the gop 9clinton incluided). It;'s not just about america. How would the world view a stole election after the last 8 years? Fear not. Teh gop is done. They just won't except their irrelevance. Tehy will be forced to accept reailty one day. Could have been yesterday. Just wait a month or so. Dean and his republcain sell-out snakes don't dare to steal the election. Don't move to south america or western europe just yet. :) All hoep is not lost. The fascists are just scared and playing their last cards, before their party dies out for a generation.
-
Old farts
Old farts and sexism helped Clinton to prevail in Pennsylvannia, the second oldest state in the country.
Obama will win both North Carolina and Indiana and the super cowards will at last end the race and come to his side as they should have all along.
Clinton should have dropped out a long time ago. Everything else is a sideshow. Clinton is a horrible person for not having bowed out gracefully a month ago. HORRIBLE!
-
Baloo, you are a horrible person. HORRIBLE
SUPER-HORRIBLE! You ridiculous mewling clown. Clinton eviscerated your boy last night, ripped hls b*lls off and put 'em in her pocket. She's exposed him as the loser he is. And he will lose, hard. It will be HORRIBLE!
-
Hey, Michelle, what happened to my b*lls?
From today's NY Times:
For Madeline Kunin, a former governor of Vermont and a Clinton supporter, her candidate’s Pennsylvania victory had a ring of feminist triumph. “It’s unexpected that she has won the toughness battle, and people are looking at Obama and questioning whether he’s tough enough,” she said. Usually, “any man, by nature of his gender, is considered tough enough, but this has been reversed or turned on its head.”
-
How much to win by?
ozmaofoz wrote:
Exactly how much does this person have to win by?
It's not the quantity that counts but the quality. That is, WHAT states were the 'W's in? Clinton has taken all high quality states: NY, PA, CA, TX, OH etc. Obama only one high quality state (WI). Hence one can say that his delegate "qualia" weights are less - perhaps barely HALF of Clinton's.
Counting just the no. of states with no regard to their Nov. import is daft, because most of them were Mickey Mouse states, or states in which blacks had a majority which they will NOT possess in the fall, since the white, conservative cracker votes in MS, AL, NC, SC will overwhelm them.
What Obie needed to do was to take PA - at least ONE big state- and take it by at least three pts. He didn't. His inability to close this deal, as perceived by the supers, will cause them to vote HRC in irrespective of any pledged delegate lead.
Incidentally, the fact that Obie could blow all the remaining primries and still have the edge in numbers at the end, shows how whacked out the Dems' primary methodology of fractional delegate allocation is.
-
StacyinDC needs to stop being spoon fed her politics
This is the internet age, look it up if you are that interested. Obama supporters don't go to see him live to get the nitty gritty details, we just look it up online, it's all there. This is the primary difference I see between the campaigns and their supporters. Younger Obama supporters and the more affluent/highly educated also happens to be the group that has more access to the internet, are more comfortable getting their information online, shopping online, doing copious amount of research online, etc.
This may explain why the Obama campaign doesn't bother with highlighting policy details in his speeches and focus more on shaping a vision/brand for their candidate. They just expect people who are interested in supporting him initiate their own research. The internet has now substantially shifted politics beyond the 5-sec sound bite into more depth and detail with unfettered access to youtube and other online resources. This kind of engaged and informed politics is what most political candidates fear since it makes spin less effective.