Letters to the Editor
-
We've been through this
There is a difference between being ahead in pledged delegates and getting the few you need to get to 2025 (which I believe is erroneous, since it seems like MI and FL were never removed from this benchmark - classical Dean eff-up) compared to getting 250-300 vote bump by party insiders.
It is legal, but the result would be a PR nightmare. It's apples:oranges.
Look - do what you like, but just be damn sure you don't lose the party's base for the next 25 years. OK?
At the end of the day I think we all agree that this is desirable.

