Letters to the Editor

This letter is associated with the following article:
Clinton notches another do-or-die big-state win in Pennsylvania. Which is more troubling for Democrats -- her scorched-earth tactics or Obama's failure to build on his base?
  • News for you Walter

    Forty-three percent of voters think Clinton will be the nominee because the MSM (including Salon) refuse to tell them the facts. NPR, ABC, FOX, etc. all pretend that this is some kind of contest. They all say she won Texas, which she lost. They all say she had a big day when she won Ohio, a day on which she got 4 more delegates than Obama. They all say she won by 10 points last night when she won by 9 with all the votes in -- a psychologically useful rounding up given all the talk about her needing double digits.

    The only way she wins is if insider white people overturn the voters' wishes. Fat chance that's going to happen. If it does, watch Clinton go down in flames in November. God knows I won't be voting for her, let alone turning out the vote for her. (And I don't want to hear about how anyone's better than McCain -- I've had to whore out my vote for too many years to the "best of two evils." No more. If Clinton got the nomination and won the general (which she can't), she'd last 4 years and the GOP could elect Rush Limbaugh against her in 2012 if they wanted.)