Letters to the Editor
-
@ jacksmith
I keep trying to understand the logic behind your idea, if any. Explain to me how it could possibly make sense that the person losing the primary should be the one to run in the general. Particularly given that she started off the primary season as the "presumed Democratic candidate", and her numbers consistently drops in every state she campaigns in.
That's really your idea of what a winning candidate looks like? Someone who's losing? Someone whose campaign goes massively into debt just to keep from collapsing altogether?
This is really the person you want to put up against the Republicans?

