Letters to the Editor
-
it's over
"The LA Times reports today on how Pennsylvania fits into the larger Democratic primary race, and has this following observation about Obama and superdelegates:
Today in Pennsylvania's hard-fought Democratic presidential primary, there will be a winner and a loser. But the winner might not be the one with the most votes....
Obama strategists said Monday that they expected to announce a series of additional endorsements by uncommitted superdelegates shortly after Pennsylvania votes. A strong showing by Obama in Pennsylvania would give superdelegates more comfort in coming forward, but a bad loss might send them back to the assessment stage.
"
-
@tropicalli
Don't pay rufus11 any mind today. Like most Obama supporters he is jittery and nervous and spamming more than usual.
-
she should pay me mind
I'm trying to help. You false charaterizations only work with old people and republcain fascists who need a reason to hate (never a shortage of reasons).
your "like most obama supporters", garbage is a sales technic. It's called the "jones effect". It is used to build a rappot with people who don't know your pulling the wool over their eyes.
You republcains, i mean clinton supporters, should not ignore reality, if favor of lies propgoanda and false narratives. You should rejoin reality. ou can't point the finger and blame everyone else. But you made your bed gop. to not force you to sleep in it will onyl worsen your fascist tactics.
-
Yes, yes rufus11
Please adjust your tinfoil hat accordingly. Thanks.
-
yes yes yes
aarraaa
Tell rove rush and hannity is said f-u next time they are telling you what to do and say, tough guy
-
Sure thing...
I will tell them what you said at our next regularly scheduled meeting. Is that okay with you?
-
metephorically speaking of course
"yes yes yes
aarraaa
Tell rove rush and hannity i said f-u next time they are telling you what to do and say, tough guy
-- rufus11 "
what is a blogger with zero credibility? a propogandist? And if they are professing fascist principles? A fascist propogandists? Yes.
Nothing's changed but the inability for patriotic americans to call a pig a pig. Can't call a fascist a fascist. "I know you are but what am I". Can't label a racist a racist. "I know you are but what am I".
when insanity and opinon/propoganda got even time with truth we all lost. Time to take the platform back in the name of truth and justice. and screw the whining crying propogandists who want to lie for profit. Divide and conquer. That used to be called treason. Because they have better lawyers now, does not change reality
-
@DOUBLE A
When Hillary wins, remember this. She whooped ASS, again. Your boy just can't compete because all the money in the world can't buy him enough votes. Americans are too smart to not notice that he is a big stinking piece of poop.
Remember this when Hillary wins the next 5 states too...
Yes she can. Yes she did. Yes she will. GOD BLESS PA.
-
The Nightmare Scenario for the DNC ....
HRC can gush all she likes but a single digit win in a state primary where she was once estimated to be around 40+ points ahead of Obama is a very bad result for Clinton indeed! She's all but out of money and her win was nowhere near big enough to make a persuasive argument to undeclared superdelegates to give her their endorsement. It is thus a very bad night for the DNC because HRC will not be persuaded to step down because the margin of victory that would perhaps persuade her otherwise would have had to have been around less than 5 points.
Now HRC supporters would be so enraged if she was now pressurised to step down - so she'll take this projected 8 points and behave as if it was the 40+ she once had. The dilemma for the DNC is that realistically HRC can only swing things her way if Obama's campaign really went off the rails - and the temptation by a ruthless 'win at any cost' opponent to lend a 'helping hand' to such a derailment could turn out to be the kind of gift to the real opposition that would turn out to be counterproductive to both prospective candidates.
-
Little Difference From Yesterday...
There's something wrong with a candidate (who just today talked of "obliterating" Iran should they attack Israel...) making a pitch this late in the campaign that she can still get people to like her.
I happen to like Hillary, but I don't love her. On the other hand, Obama's speeches are nearly intoxicating at times.
More and more, though, Hillary makes me think of my governor (Blagojevich, in Illinois). Re-electing him was kind of like... the 24-hour period leading up the moment the colonoscopy begins. You know, it's probably going to be ok when it's all over, but at the very least there's going to be a lot of wincing going on.
-
The Nightmare Scenario for the DNC .... Indeed
From the RCP Blog:
"The tide is turning," Hillary said, concluding her victory speech. As Jay noted, we likely won't know the final margin until tomorrow, but right now Hillary is up 10 points with [95%] reporting. If she can hang on to 10, that seems like a convincing victory.
But the Clinton campaign will likely trumpet another number: It seems that come tomorrow Hillary will lead in the popular vote count (if one includes Michigan and Florida). - BLAKE DVORAK
The problem for the Obama campaign is that it's not necessarily about the pledged delegates right now. Clinton is going to net 200,000+ in the popular vote count tonight, getting her very much back on track to catching Obama, especially when Florida (and, on a stretch, Michigan) is included in the tally. She's also successfully turned the narrative to the question that many people - but most especially super delegates - are asking tonight, which is: why can't he close the deal? He spent $11 million in Pennsylvania and got his clock cleaned. That is not something that can be spun away easily, and it will cause any nagging doubts about his candidacy to grow over the next few days as the super delegates and the media digest what went down tonight in the Keystone State. - TOM BEVAN