Letters to the Editor
-
Then she eat
the pussy-cat up Cynthera. WOW i am glad I did not have to see that.
-
My cat was not the only feline victim of Hillary, apparently
She ate Kathleen Willey's cat too!
http://www.hillaryproject.com/index.php?/en/story-details/did_clinton_operative_try_to_silence_kathleen_willey/
I see a pattern of pure, unadulterated, cat-eating evil!
-
@Hhatchet
Do you have a link for the Reich quotes you listed in your letter?
-
ABC Boycott
The debate did a disservice to both of the candidates and the viewers. In order to help assure future debates focus on issues of importance (to most of us) we need to send a strong message. May is a sweeps month for television ratings, ratings that determine what advertisers pay to air ads. Boycott ABC News AND entertainment for the entire month. If enough of us do it and ratings drop the debates in the general election may be more focused on what matters to most in the electorate. Please spread the word.
-
valid reasons xeroid47
No one is downplaying or challaging the choice of candidate based on policies.
What people are challenging is her tactics bogus gossip arguements, and how she and mccain are held to account for zero zilch nada, and we got to listen to questions about patriotism and pastors and nonsense us weekly gossip.
No one is poo pooing the candidate's policies. We are poo pooing her tactics, bogus arguements and taking the democratic party down the rabbit hole with the gop.
-
actually, after reading the full post xeroid47. Bogus reasons.
False narrative reaons. But that's neither here nor there. propogate on
-
I don't have a dog right now,
but if I did, and Obama got it, I'd be bitter.
-
She's not bad...
...I mean look at Iraq it's not THAT bad is it?
-
MVP I will get that to you
I couldn't believe my eyes and just had to get the info to Salon readers I forgot to get the link.
But to the Asian young lady who is voting for Hillary.
She said Hillary not wavering on her Iraq vote was courageous. How about stubborn? After she found out that there were no WMD,to say that vote was not wrong was again stubborn not courageous. Mrs. Clinton did not ever read the intel report before she voted. There were others at the time who were saying that there were no WMD to be found. Two of those people were weapons inspectors Scott Ritter and Chief Weapons Inspector Hans Blix. Hillary's vote was not courageous she just wanted to look tough so when she ran for President. She sacrificed lives to look tough.
As for her changing the good ol boy agenda that is funny. Hillary is married to the biggest boy in the good ol boy system. There is only one black in the senate. There are many white women. Those women have not change anything. Why would they they benefit from the status quo.
And by your view the only reason Barack is "in" is because he is an affirmative-action recipient.
Affirmative-action is not something black people came up with. It was a tool that was implemented by whites. Do you really think it was put in place to eleviate pass historical injustices. No, it was put in place to limit the amount of qualified minorities. Because if to many get in the club, the club would sure enough change.
So when you say he is a affirmative-action recipient understand you are saying he is just as and even more qualified to be where he is.
He has raised more money,run a better campaign and inspired more people then the so-called more qualified Hillary. He was the President of the Harvard Law School but for some like you nothing will ever be good enough.
Her 93' Healthcare proposal was a bust. Not because the GOP did everything to sink it but she had the power of her husband as President, and dems in control of the House and Senate and she was still unable to get it done. Talk about incompetence.
The stupid arguement that Caucuses are for upper class is just that stupid. Barack raised 90 million dollars in 2 months. Those contributions were for 100 dollars or less. I guess all that money came from rich black people? No, Barack has gotten support from rich,poor, upper class and middle Class. His support is broad and inclusive. That is why he is winning.
-
Link for MVP
nymag.com/daily/intel/2008/04/heilemann_
Reich endorsement
-
clinton capsized. This back and forth is moot
She is about to get clobbered in pa. Don't believe the media hype. When have they been right yet, this year and 06?
The gop media is irrelevant. No accountability for their own, thus no credibility destroyed them. For some insane reason clinton wants what the gop is offering. Why, no one knows (what are their ratings as a part vs the democratic on every issue). Why would she go from the winning team/platform to a gop platform? Other than sabotage and respect from the fascists, what's in it for her? What democrat will vote for her in their state in the future? After the last debate.
Clinton ruined her carrer. She is stuck in the past. She did learn the wrong lessons from the 90's. In the 2000's bush and his fascist became terrorists to deafeat terrorists. Clinton became gop to defeat he gop.
our democratic movement will not become fascists to defeat the fascists. No accountability and a media with no credibility (and craved none) did major damage to this nation. The gop model. We will not allow clinton to bring the democratic party down the gop rabbit hole. not this time.
-
Oh, Rufus, it is not about fascism
It's about the unchecked, cynical, and corrupt consumption of cats.
-
It is probably true...
that she is not as bad as I think. Yes, probably just a little bit better than that.
-
Jameslow, do not be fooled, do not let her lull you into a false sense of security
Because she will eat your fucking cat, I'm telling you.
-
xeroid,
I appreciate your post, even if I don't agree with it. The only thing that bothers me is the continued complaint that those of us voting for Obama are "demonizing" Clinton. If you look at the comments in any letters-column section on this site, I think you'll see that both Obama and Clinton supporters are capable of demonizing the opposting candidate. And I'd argue that there would be far less of it here if Salon was more even-handed in its reportage, or simply hosest about its bias.