Letters to the Editor

Letters posted here are associated with the following article:
Hillary Clinton showed off her softer side in the Philly burbs with witty advice on how to sell herself to undecided voters.
The letters thread is now closed.
  • Obama is evil too, he kiled my dog

    But I never liked the damn thing. And he didn't cackle while he did it, like Hillary did. He just sort of seemed resigned.

  • Cynthera

    Let me get this right. Hillary snuck into your house and eat your little Pussy-cat?

  • I bet she is. he he he

    "Rufus, she is WORSE than a Republican

    She is a vile, vile CAT-EATER!

    -- cythera45"

    don't her accountable. Instead blame all the worlds ills on obama. Much easier to point the finger at the messanger than to take responsibility for ones actions. How is clinton not a hypocrite republcain again?

    Obama could bring out santa's list, with clinton. We could post gaffe's, lies, crimes all day. Why do we not? think long and hard about that gop, I mean clinton supporters. Yet you still hate and blame? What more can we do to NOT destroy clinton? Why does she not recipracate? Power lust? Greed? Intolerance? Fear? She's a republcain?

    I wouldn't have any issue if she did this as a republcain against a democrat in the general. Put an r next to her name, get it over with. What I take issue with is her gop tactics arguementss and teh sabotage of her own party. Out of greed and power lust. That's all. Forgive me. Obama and his supporters are the cause of all teh worlds ills. He is the devil anti-christ and hitler all wrapped into one, right gop) i mean linton supporters).

  • THAT'S WHAT YOU THINK

    Hillary Clinton is a bottom sucker. She has shown herself for what she really is during this campaign. She has shown herself to be mean spirited, egocentric, dishonest,disingenuous and only interested in gaining power. We are very fortunate that she has run such a transparent campaign so that maybe we can get rid of her for good and get her out of the senate also. As a New Yorker , in addition to her being a carpet bagger, she has been a lackluster senator with little or no accomplishments in her time in the senate.

    IT IS A BEAUTIFUL THING TO WATCH HER CAMPAIGN IMPLODING!!!! COULDN'T HAPPEN TO A MORE DESERVING PERSON!!!!!!

  • Nancianne doesn't know the HALF of it

    The worst was the little cackle she gave as she cracked my cat's spine. It woke me from a sound sleep. I could just make out Hillary's outlined hunched in the corner. My cat was mewing piteously--until she chomped off its head in ONE BITE!

  • She's better than you think

    As an Asian-American male who think Kucinich best align with my value, yet prefer Hillary Clinton over Barick Obama I would like to discuss my reasons. I particularly dislike the demonization on HRC going on here and other leftist threads. I just want to throw out my view for intelligent discussions.

    1. Iraq, I consider Iraq invasion to be a disaster before it occurred and totally disagree with HRC's vote on Iraq resolution. Yet as a New Yorker I can't really fault HRC for being a realist and voted in favor although with standard stipulations to preserve her viability. Senator Dodd, Biden, and others who wanted to be president all voted in favor. I am not denigrating others like Senator Feingold or Boxer for voting their conscience, but the vote was a foregone conclusion with Republicans setting a trap for Democrats. Obama did make a speech against it when he was a state senator, but with his ambition I doubt that he would have voted against it if he was in the senate, just as he has supported Lieberman against Lamont and didn't make any noise when he got in the club. The fact HRC has not bent her knee and groove for forgiveness from left inspired all the venom directed at her which I find totally unjustified.

    2. Healthcare, The left and MSM have been mocking HRC for her failure in 93. I consider that's totally to her credit trying to reform an issue ahead of her time. Today, even large corporations have softened their opposition to government provided healthcare except the drug and insurance companies. Sure, the goal is for single-payer to cut off all the middlemen, and eventually Democratic Party will come around to it like all other developed countries, but meanwhile I think she is much more committed to its actualization then Obama.

    3. Race, The fact is we are not in a post-racial phase as some of Obama's supporters claim, any preceived slight has triggered racist charges. HRC has been tarred for using negative campaign, but what can she really run against? She can't run against hope and unity, experiences and defeats are counted against you, while racism charges justified or not hangs like a sword of Democle on every utterance. She may not have Obama's eloquence, but she can expostulate many different topics and overall record has been good to the minority communities. What has it got her? 13% of Ohio's black votes? Hell, even George Bush got 8%. Sure, racial pride trumps over overall record, Oprah superficiality trump over real values. Left will not touch this with a ten foot pole, and they wonder why Kansas voted against their economic interests? Now I am not equiting Clarence Thomas to Obama, but it smacks of the worst aspects of affirmative action which I do support but my son and others in Asia-American community find offensive.

    4. Caucus versus primary, to me dispite the flowery rhetoric caucus are by definition exclusive and anti-democratic. If caucus are used in South, yells of racism will put a quick stop to it. It acts like a poll tax, and against working class and poor. Now Clinton campaign may be a disaster for ignoring them, but that does not negate the criticism. You can claim rule is rule, and disallow Michigan and Florida, and I don't think HRC can pull a rabbit out of the super delegates, but you can't have both ways, either the rule is rule, or not, but not complain if it goes against you in one way and accept the other way.

    5. MSM and conservatives has been relentless in attacking HRC and giving Obama a pass until now that he seem to be inevitable candidate. It is not because post racial or Obama is unknown. It is because they consider HRC is a real threat, more dangerous to their agenda than Obama. The fact that she seem to be able to borrow into the exclusive senate club and still hold on to her agenda in health care and morphing into center. Sure, who knows what will happen when Obama become president? He may will be what he says, a transformational figure, I hope so, but it will still be over the body of neo-con and their agendas. No slogin of unity will mask that fact.