Letters to the Editor
-
@ red_gti2000
... shouldn't the _independent_ votes of the superdelegates count even more?... It would seem to me, then, that _if_ both the pledged delegate and popular vote counts are close then the superdelegates would have a moral obligation to discount the "gaming" that went on and vote for the candidate they believed had the better chance of winning the election.
I would agree, except you are making a few assumptions:
- super delegates are independent
- super delegates are logical
- super delegates are moral
and forgetting one important fact
- super delegates are POLITICIANS

