Letters to the Editor
-
How is blowing up a building that engages in acts against nature
er, buildings do not engage in acts, lol.
That belief that one building is part of the problem, rather than a community meeting space for countless differnt people and views is part of the problem. That belief that innocent collateral can be sacraficed for the sake of YOUR personal views is wrong. The building did nothing, yet you think it's OK to ruin it and anyone who inconveniently happens to be in there at the same time. Just to make YOUR point.
The building, nor any of it's inhabitatanst were NOT engaged in "acts against nature." (lol, sounds like what they used to say about homosexuality--You sound about as shrill and intolerant as those extreme fundamentalist haters)

