Letters to the Editor

This letter is associated with the following article:
In an alarming case, U.S. attorneys exploited post-9/11 counterterrorism policies to pursue and prosecute an environmental activist.
  • The solution to bad laws is to apply them to everybody

    So we have that 'the USA Patriot Act created a new category of domestic terrorism, which is defined as an offense "calculated to influence or affect the conduct of government"'. By this definition, every congressional lobbyist is a terrorist.

    Moreover, 'or "to intimidate or coerce a civilian population."' clearly implicates the Bush administration as a terrorist cell.

    If as described, however, this case was lost during voir dire. Tainted, conflicting eye witnesses versus an exculpatory receipt? This should have been a text book example of reasonable doubt.