Letters to the Editor
-
If she did it
she is guilty of terrorism.
The thing is, the case against her by the sounds of it, is so full of holes as to produce a reasonable doubt that she did it.
Indeed, the reciept leaves one thinking that it may have been highly unlikely for her to have done it.
There is a strong possibility of the prosecution using "Terrorism" to try and scare the jury into a guilty vote.
This article would have done better focussing on the witch-hunt style hysteria raised by "terrorism" than questioning whether politically motivated arson counts as terrorism.

