Letters to the Editor
-
Re: plenty of reasonable doubt
Seventh, you say you haven't seen any damning evidence and the articles don't point to any. That's my point exactly. This article seems to be the most thorough (among the others I googled) - and this article doesn't mention what seems to be a vital piece of evidence. Now I have no idea what ALL the evidence is, and I certainly don't know enough about the case to know whether or not there's enough reasonable doubt. What I do know is that this article neglected a major fact and seems, to me, to be pretty biased. That's not to say Waters is guilty - it's just to say that I don't think anyone can make a decision about her guilt or innocence based on the selective reporting in this article.
I will say that being young and stupid and a college girl in love isn't really a valid defense for being an accomplice in any sort of crime....and I say this as someone who was once a young stupid college girl in love with a sketchy guy.