Letters to the Editor
-
@jebldmm
The fact that the jury did not convice on the more serious charges is telling. If this woman was guilty of participating in this serious crime, why did they not convict her of everything? I suspect that the jury was compromising. They weren't sure of her guilt, but they didn't want to let a possible terrorist out onto the street, so they compromised and found her partially guilty.
Or they believed she was there, so they convicted her of arson, but they were deadlocked on the charges of whether she helped to build or transport an explosive device. Some of the jurors apparently favored a conviction on the latter charges, and some didn't.
Incidentally, how do you feel about your jury case now? Do you think justice was served? If the jury had convicted, do you think you would be regretting it to this day?