Letters to the Editor
-
@ sunspot
Hear, hear.
Well said.
As soon as Clinton conceded that John McCain had the experience requisite to be commander-in-chief it was clear she'd never beat him, which I had suspected anyway.
Perhaps I'm wrong, but it seemed to me at the time that if her strategy was to "go toe to toe" with McCain on national security, she'd never win.
The only way to beat McCain is to change the terms of the debate, not to try to convince people that your member is as large as his.
It's not about posturing and fear-mongering and once Clinton put that 3am nonsense on the table as a serious issue, I wondered under what scenario she could win a contest of dueling 3am ads against a senior citizen white male war hero.
Such a blunderous, myopic and self-destructive strategy.
Does anyone believe that any voter looking for a hawk will choose Clinton over McCain?
Really, does anyone believe that?