Letters to the Editor

This letter is associated with the following article:
If Clinton beats the odds and wins the Democratic nomination, Republicans will say she stole it. And then they'll try to give voters a 1990s flashback.
  • A failed strategy

    As with all the naysayers and Hillary haters who post their absurd reasons for why Hillary would lose, the Republican strategy is as useless as Obama's is in attacking Hillary for many reasons, a few of them being as follows: No one cared about the scandals the Repubs tried to smear her and her husband with back then. They still don't. The only ones who do are a media that always hated her, Obamabots who are as crazed as any right wing nut, and, of course, the right wing kooks themselves...not exactly a crew who matter to the vast swath of voters out there. Obama's negatives are obvious to anyone who wants to see them: a man who chooses to lecture the voters, rather than listen to them, a serious flaw that cannot make him ever electable. He acts as if the nomination is his right, much more so than Hillary ever has. In an early 90s interview, Obama haughtily claims he will never have a problem getting a job as a lawyer, since he was at the top of his Harvard class...save the snot nosed bullshit for your grandmother...the one you threw under the bus...Christopher Hitchens has a fabulous smackdown about THAT on Salon. So when I hear a ridiculous slew of blabbering TV pundits and Obama shills telling us he has it locked up, I say, NOT on your life.