Letters to the Editor
-
"Steal?"
Just a question, how does one “steal” an election? If they get to the convention relatively close in pledged delegates, the job of the super delegates is to do what they feel is in the best interest of the party, the country, and who’s best able to take on the republican nominee. What’s this “steal” crap? If the super delegates are just supposed to vote precisely parallel to the pledged delegates, who hell needs them? It’s just this type of situation why they were conceived.
Just to set the record straight, I prefer Hillary, but will gladly vote for Obama if he’s the nominee. However I don’t have any illusions as to his vulnerabilities. Let’s get real; he started running for President the day after his 2004 convention speech. His Presidential team was almost complete when he was sworn in as Senator, having beaten a joke of an opponent. His experience is literally zero. Please don’t tout his “community organizer” stint. That’s where Tony Rezco comes in. That’s a boil that’s waiting to be lanced. We’re supposed to believe he’s so committed to the poor and down trodden that he gave up the chance to make lots of money at prestigious law firms. But I don’t know too many state senators, fresh from “organizing” who can, or would want to, purchase a two million dollar home.
You haven’t heard all there is about Barrack Obama. Unfortunately it’s going to be left to right wing to vette him, as the MSM seems to be in the tank. I have never seen the misogyny puss ooze as venomously as the op-ed writers of the NY Times have treated us.
The stakes are huge. Let them fight it out. And then let’s get behind the one left standing.