Read other letters about this article
Okay, let me see if I have this straight. If I mention facts, I am attacking Mr. Obama if they relate to his experience, his ethics, his financing, and/or his plan to revitalize this country AND if I am attacking him I am either unfairly attacking him, I am insulting your intelligence, or I am a racist.
Going back to my first post, not only did I not take the first bite, but I am certainly not going to swallow this nonsense.
Mr. Brandel has set up the perfect scenario by which his candidate can say and do anything and we, using his "fairness" paradigm, have to accept at face value the 'give hope a chance' propaganda or be labeled ignorant, racist, a 'bad' democrat, or insulting.
Sounds like Fascism to me. Unlike Mr. Brandel, I do not prescribe to any such dictator and I still live in a country where open debate is guaranteed under the Constitution. Remember, we still have a right to speak....don't we.
I have a right to ask Mr. Obama, and by default his supporters, anything because he wants to be in charge of the United States of America. I can challenge, question, demand, quote, and scrutinize every aspect of his past, his church, his finances, and his words WITHOUT being labeled anything other than a good American if this is still the country I think it is. Furthermore, if he is all good--as you propose--than why are you so scared of the questions?
Still Proud, Still a Girl, and still in Texas!